Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

Open Toolkits

Open Toolkits

OERs composed by MA Contemporary Art Theory Students

Curatopia: A Critical Curation Roleplay Toolkit

Reading Time: 6 minutes

Summary

Participants will experience the construction of curatorial frameworks by engaging in exhibition conceptualisation and critical practice through assuming diverse roles within the curatorial process. Utilising this toolkit, participants are encouraged to gain an initial experience of critical dialogue within contemporary art curation.

Ready to step into the shoes of a curator, artist, audience, or critic?

Ready to dive straight into a mini simulated exhibition?

No prior expertise required

Simply immerse yourself in the role

simulate the exhibition

and relish the debate!

 

 

🦋

Over these 20 minutes, you’ll engage in exhibition conceptualisation and critical practice by embodying roles within the curatorial process.
Experience the process of constructing curatorial frameworks, artistic judgements, and critical discourse.

 

 

 

❗PLEASE NOTE❗

Role-playing simulations are not merely binary oppositions

Feel free to express

your preferences

and

your confusion

Let this game be grounded in discussion rather than argument!

 

 

【The card materials and recommended list included in this toolkit can be found in the appendix at the end.】

 

 

 

LET‘S START!

👇

 


Number of participants

 

Recommended group size:

【2 players per group】 or 【4–8 players per group】

Each participant will draw a role:

【4–8 players per group】 Curator / Artist / Critic / Audience

【2 players per group】 Hosting party / Visiting party

 


 

Toolkit Material

 

 

🎴Identity Card🎴

Including task and authority settings

🖊Curation and Artwork Cards🖊

The exhibition materials within the card kit may be used directly. Alternatively, curators may freely select items from our open museum platform. Should printing prove inconvenient, we support the distribution of digital images via social media groups.

 

Keyword Cards

(Groups A, B, C, D)

🌈Exhibition Label/Review Card🌈

 

🎨Feedback Card🎨

(for peer assessment)

📱Stopwatch

(a mobile phone will suffice)

 

 


Procedure (4-8 Player Version)

 

Total duration: approximately 20 minutes

The structure is Drawing cards → Simulated exhibition → Exhibition review → Feedback

 

 

STEP 1: Get Cards Randomly (4 minutes)

1. Each participant take one identity card (Curator / Critic / Artist / Audience)

 

 

Curator

1 character card [role ideally voluntary. Requires deciding on exhibition type (select one exhibition + x sets of artworks)] + exhibition label card

Artist

1 role card + several artwork cards (when multiple artists are present, each player drawn as an artist receives an equal number of artwork cards) + exhibition label card

Other roles 

1 role card + review card (critical comment card)

Public cards

Exhibition cards, artwork cards, keyword cards

 

 

Curators select exhibitions and artworks card

(recommended exhibitions and works may be used directly)

 

Select keyword cards

 The Curatorial team(Curators and artists )may additionally choose from Type D; The Visitors (critics and audiences) may additionally choose from Type C. Types A and B are public keyword cards.

 

Please note:

Unselected keyword cards may still be chosen and utilised during subsequent exhibition processes.

 

STEP 2: Simulated Exhibition (8–10 minutes)

 

Participants shall commence the simulated exhibition after thoroughly reviewing the task cards.
All players must fully immerse themselves in their assigned roles—the game begins!

The Curatorial Team shall commence their presentation: the curator and artist introduce the exhibition and works.
The Visitors shall initiate discussion: critics and audience pose questions and raise objections.
Both sides shall engage in debate, with the curatorial team responding to and defending against the viewing audience’s statements.

 ↓

Please note:
Curators must respond promptly to ‘challenges’, employing either the keyword ‘forced interpretation”‘or a hybrid approach combining ‘technical jargon + gibberish’… In short, since none of us are experts, it’s simply a matter of who sounds more plausible!

 

 

STEP 3: Output exhibition labels or short reviews (3-5 minutes)

The Curatorial Team: Artists + curators to draft exhibition labels/curatorial texts (within 50 words)

 

The Visitors: Audience and critics to compose any number of reviews (within 50 words)

All outputs to be completed using template cards, which may be filled in by hand or printed.

STEP 4Presentation and Reflection (3 min)

 

A miniature ‘exhibition’ displaying all cards on the table

Curator publicly shares exhibition details

Participants shed their roles and engage in reflection using feedback cards

 

DONE


 

Procedure (Two-Player Version)

 

The process remains identical

with the distinction being that one party assumes the role of the curator and artist(The Curatorial Team)

while the other acts as the critic and audience (The visitor).


Toolkit Appendix

👉Brief Description

This Toolkit constitutes a critical role-playing game which designed to explore power negotiations, cultural contexts, and discursive structures within exhibition curation and art criticism by simulating the multiple identities of ‘curator-critic-artist-audience’ within the contemporary art field.

Participants will conceive, justify, simulate presentations, and engage in reflective feedback around real or fictional contemporary artworks. The process encourages role-rotation, collective negotiation, and critical expression to deepen understanding of curating as a cultural production apparatus.

👉Learning Outcomes

Upon completion of this programme, learners are expected to be able to:

Identify key roles within the curatorial process and their cultural functions (such as artists, curators, critics, audiences, institutions)

Critically analyse contemporary artworks

Practise debate and negotiation within ‘contested cultural fields’ through role-play and group discussions;

Design and articulate a small-scale exhibition or critical text demonstrating an understanding of curatorial structures;

Reflect upon and write about curatorial activities.

 

card content

You may choose to print or use the electronic version.

 

Exhibition and Artwork Cards

Exhibition and Artwork Cards

 

 

📕Recommendations for Open Access Museums and Platforms

      1. SMK – Statens Museum for Kunst

Website: https://www.smk.dk/en/

License:

        • Images on this website not protected by copyright or not marked “© Artist/VISDA” are licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 by default.
        • Public domain works are released under Public Domain / CC0.
        • Public domain works of 19th–20th century Danish art, photographs, and exhibition installation images (unless otherwise copyrighted).

Note: SMK explicitly permits use for teaching and derivative works. Attribution is required when using:

Image: Statens Museum for Kunst (SMK), CC BY-SA 4.0 / CC0.

      1. The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Website: https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection

License:

The ‘Open Access’ image is licensed under CC0 1.0 (Public Domain) and may be freely used worldwide.
Suitable exhibitions/works for selection:
        • Modern and Contemporary Art in The Met Open Access Collection.
        • Recommended search keywords: Modern Art, 20th Century, Photography, Installation View (CC0).

Note: Fully available for use in OER, publishing, and re-creation without requiring permission.

Image: The Metropolitan Museum of Art – Open Access (CC0).

      1. Tate Gallery

Website: https://www.tate.org.uk/art

License:

Tate grants Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) licence for selected works in its collection.
Images from historical collections or exhibition photography that have entered the public domain may be considered Public Domain.
Suitable exhibitions/works for selection:
Early 20th-century modernism, photography, installation exhibition photographs (without copyright notices).
Prioritise consultation of the Tate Open Collection or Research & Archive Images.
Notes:
Permitted for classroom and non-commercial educational display.
For OER re-creation, prioritise images marked Public Domain / Open Collection.
Image: Tate Gallery (London), CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 / Public Domain (as indicated).
      1. MoMA – The Museum of Modern Art

Website: https://www.moma.org/collection/

License:

        • MoMA does not adopt CC licensing across its entire collection, but images marked “© Estate / Licensed by MoMA” within its “Digital Collection” are subject to restrictions.
        • Certain early photographs and public domain works are labelled Public Domain / No known copyright.
          Suitable exhibitions/works for selection:
          Modern artworks from the early to mid-20th century (e.g., public domain works by Paul Klee, Brâncuși, Picasso).
          Select “Public Domain / Open Image Permitted” in the search filters.
          Note:
          Public domain works may be freely used for teaching and OER;
          Contemporary artwork images must remain confined to classroom use.
          Usage and attribution guidelines (recommended standard format)
          Image: The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), Public Domain / Open Image Permitted.
          In all teaching materials or OER resources, please consistently use the following attribution format
          Image credit example:
          Artist Name, Title of Work, Year. Museum Name – City. Licensed under [CC BY-SA 4.0 / CC0 /Public Domain]. Source: [Museum URL].
Curatopia © 2025 by Zhiyu Yang is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0
css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel