Astrobiology Periodic Table

By Luke Mitchell

Charles S. Cockell from the UK Centre for Astrobiology (UKCA) at our very own University was involved in the creation of the Astrobiology Periodic Table. Reminiscent of the logic that Mendeleev himself followed in the creation of the modern periodic table, this Astrobiology Periodic Table serves its user as a compartmented ‘Lego box’ that shows how all the elements in the modern Periodic Table are involved in life as we know it. From how the elements are formed, to their biological use, the Table shows vital information for astrobiologists, astrochemists and astronomers at a glance.

Prof Cockell and his colleagues at the UKCA are involved in a myriad of scientific endeavours. From bringing science to the narrow confines of prison cells via “Life Beyond”, to exploring the possibility of life on Mars. The centre is also involved the “Astrobiology Academy” for implementation into the school curriculum and many more public engagement events where they discuss the very essence of life with people.

For example, their research into life in extreme environments is carried out on Earth in a variety of analogue scenarios. They examine life in sulfidic springs, lava terrains, mine shafts – such as Boulby – and bodies of water like Lake Graenavatn in Iceland. These environments allow researchers to not only study how life might fare in these areas but also improve technologies and materials that we would like to send into space!

I asked Prof Cockell a few questions about the Periodic Table:

Q When was the first instance you thought that an Astrobiology Periodic Table would be useful?

A It occurred to me whilst preparing the Wiley-Blackwell textbook: ‘Astrobiology: Understanding Life in the Universe’ that it would be useful to show where the elements came from and what they do in life – a sort of astrobiological perspective on elements. The obvious way to do that is using a Periodic Table.

Q Is there anything you feel that needs to be added to the Table?

A It would be good to add more information on biological uses, but at the same time it currently has a simplicity that I think is good.

Q What’s the most exciting astrobiological event you are looking forwards to in 2019?

A Hopefully flying our experiment to study microbes on the International Space Station. More widely, European and US preparations for missions to Mars.

One of the missions to Mars that Prof Cockell refers to is the U.S. mission to mars by NASA named “InSight”. The mission is “designed to give the Red Planet its first thorough check-up since it formed 4.5 billion years ago. It is the first outer space robotic explorer to study in-depth the “inner space” of Mars: its crust, mantle, and core.

For more information on this mission:

For more information on the UKCA’s activities:

International Year of the Periodic Table:

From quantum physics to harvesting energy from stars: reflection on an interview with Freeman Dyson

I’m not sure which is more impressive. Freeman Dyson’s championing of a new era of quantum electrodynamics, or the scale upon which his formidable intellect had an impact.

In his own words, “My most important contribution was the unification of the Feynman-Schwinger-Tomonaga versions of quantum electrodynamics.”, when asked by Vedant Bhargava what he felt was his greatest scientific achievement. Yet his influence spans from fundamental particles like the electron on the scale of roughly 10−18m to a colossal megastructure dubbed a Dyson sphere that would encompass a whole star. Just for reference, the radius of the Sun is on the scale of roughly 108m. That’s something you need a powerful microscope to see right in front of you vs. something you can with your eyes (do not try this at home) 150 million kilometres away. Dyson’s influence is prevalent at every stage.

Not only was he an intellectual behemoth, but he lived through World War II and worked on multiple space-related projects (most notably ‘Orion’). During the war he worked for the Royal Air Force’s bomber command. But, in his own words, his job “had nothing to do with mathematics, either pure or applied”, but this section of his interview is still an interesting read nonetheless. Project Orion intended to create a spacecraft propelled by nuclear power, however, given time to reflect, Dyson now believes “There does not seem to be any type of mission that is well matched to nuclear rockets. Nuclear rockets are too heavy for local missions and too slow for high-velocity missions.”

Something else I noticed that I find particularly amusing, was that the competitiveness between Dyson and his colleagues (Michael Atiyah in this article) appears to have lost none of its vigour despite lasting long over half a century. “Game on”, Dr. Atiyah appears to say as Austin insinuates that Dyson would be double checking Dr. Atiyah’s proof to a million-dollar problem, the Riemann Hypothesis, and solving it in his own right.

Read the full interview coordinated by year 3 student Austin Morris.