Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

Open Toolkits

Open Toolkits

OERs composed by MA Contemporary Art Theory Students

Make Art More Accessible

Summary

We are concerned about many social phenomena of unequal distribution of art resources, the most significant of which is the "accessibility" of art. In this Open Toolkit, learners will understand art accessibility cases, put forward their ideas and opinions from the perspective of people with disabilities (here mainly refers to the physical), and finally engage in interactive reflection.

This Open Toolkit is designed to give learners an initial awareness of the issue of accessibility in the arts and to understand and think about accessibility facilities in arts institutions.


Step 1:Recall the Accessibility Signs around You (2 min)

First of all, please recall the barrier-free facilities you have encountered in your life. Do you recognize these barrier-free signs?

Please click the picture to go to the answer page.

Example:


Please Consider the Following Identification Names:

Step 2 Understanding Barrier-free Facilities (2 min)

According to the picture, do you recognize these accessibility  facilities, and which groups of people were they created for?

Think about it first and then click the picture to go to the correct answer page.

Example:


Please Consider the Role of the Following Facilities:

Step 3 Read the “Art Accessibility Guide Manual” (5 min)

In this 5 minutes, you will learn about the accessibility design of some art institutions, how they consider and put into practice for people with disabilities.

 

Example 1: Audio Descriptive

 

https://soundcloud.com/britishmuseum/sets/new-audio-descriptive-guide?utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing

 

Example 2: Sign Language Guided Tour

 

https://youtu.be/ZxntvQcNlEw

 

Example 3: Barrier-free Art Exhibition

Step 4  Choose a Case and Give Your Opinion (5 min)

Choose a virtual exhibition that interests you and spend five minutes browsing through it.
From the perspective of the visually impaired, the hearing-impaired and the wheelchair-bound, you will think about what barrier-free facilities need to be built in the exhibition, and which facilities are the most appropriate according to the form and content of the exhibition.

Case 1: Prix Marcel Duchamp 2022                     —ADIAF

https://my.matterport.com/show/?m=5cHvqsu55RX

Case 2: Federico Uribe: Metamorphosis       —MMOCA

https://my.matterport.com/show/?m=g6BKrV924Da

Case 3: Sam Gilliam’s Exhibition                     —MMOCA

https://my.matterport.com/show/?m=zUSiHpHABof

 

Step 5 Comment and Reflection (6 min)

There are Two Options:
Options 1: In the Miro Board, describe the art institutions/galleries/museums you have visited/viewed online that you think are doing a Good Job in Accessibility, and you can also browse good examples given by others and post your comments.

(Please give the name of the pavilion and the city where it is located, preferably with a picture)

Please copy the link below and paste it into your browser for access:

https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVL_QaeHw=/?share_link_id=993544623284


Options 2: Submit case comments or reflections on accessibility in 50 words or less in the comments section. Please mark your chosen case number and give your thoughts and suggestions based on the case.

We can think about it from the following aspects:

1)What barrier-free facilities should be added to the museum in the case to make it more accessible.

2)What does the pavilion do well in accessibility and what does it do poorly.

3)In addition to accessibility in the pavilion, what are some ways to make art works and art resources more accessible.


The above questions are designed to provide you with ideas. You can choose one or two of them to answer, or you can give your own opinion.

 

Make Art More Accessible © 2024 by Yuman Ma is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 

 

(https://openverse.org/image/d4618443-58cc-46b2-abec-6c245a791504?q=sidewalk+for+the+blind "Assistance for the blind" by Jason Riedy is licensed under CC BY 2.0.)

(https://openverse.org/image/5485f6e8-78bc-4e90-82af-5cc1c4dd6a14?q=Accessible+toilet "2022-07-31 Accessible toilet at Shizuoka Service Area (NEOPASA静岡) 障害者用トイレ DSCF2744" by 松岡明芳 is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.)

(https://openverse.org/image/6c7fc1b8-ef22-44f4-b899-1adfd3a69d16?q=Blind+button "Why is there no standard for elevator buttons? How would a blind person see the blinking light? Why isn't the help button itself in braille? Would the braille be necessary if we had more consistent icon representations?" by bionicteaching is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.)

(https://openverse.org/image/3f506ca3-8f27-4dba-8c34-7ac8ba9afc04?q=wheelchair+accessible "Momochi-chūō Park the public telephone booth equipped for wheelchair access Fukuoka 20240614" by Hirho is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.)

(https://openverse.org/image/dc1ecc61-656a-4be6-8166-f3af24c03cc2?q=wheelchair+accessible "Wheelchair Access to Guisborough Magistrates Court - geograph.org.uk - 574952" by Mick Garratt is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.)

(https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M%C3%BCnchen,_Alpines_Museum,_Tastmodell,_1.jpeg This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.)

4 replies to “Make Art More Accessible”

  1. s2706336 says:

    More ramps and elevators should be included in Sam Gilliam’s Exhibition. I noticed that there is a small flight of steps in Sam Gilliam’s Exhibition and the doors are very narrow, which is not friendly to disabled people who need to use a wheelchair.

  2. Jinghan Xu says:

    Case two:
    ADDITION: Automatic read-alouds can be added around the text of the online exhibit presentation.
    Benefit: There is an accessible wheelchair ramp, making it easy for people with travel disabilities to visit.
    Disadvantage: exhibit descriptions are not read aloud, making them inconvenient for the visually impaired.
    Other ways: robust online website. Ability to enable audiences to participate in the arts regardless of time, location, and economic conditions.

  3. Jiaying Lyu says:

    In our daily life, we often see people with physical disabilities, but rarely pay attention to some special facilities they use in art museums. This toolkit allows me to discover details that I ignore in life.
    I think the museum in this case, uses facilities to take care of some wheelchair users and visually impaired people, but there seems to be little attention to the hearing impaired. I think the museum can pay more attention to accessibility.

  4. Hanyun Xue says:

    Case 2: Federico Uribe: Metamorphosis —MMOCA
    Strengths:
    • The height of the display panels is low, which takes into consideration the needs of individuals with disabilities who use wheelchairs.
    • In another exhibition hall by the same organizer, ramps are used instead of stairs, ensuring accessibility for people with mobility challenges.

    Weaknesses:
    • There is no assistance provided for individuals who are hearing or visually impaired. It is recommended to offer operable devices designed for visually impaired individuals, such as those that play audio guides for the exhibition.
    • The corners of the tables could be equipped with protective padding to prevent injuries for visually impaired individuals.
    • The absence of automatic doors makes it inconvenient for people of varying abilities to enter. It is suggested to install automatic doors to allow for unrestricted and easy access for all.

Leave a reply

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel