Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

Reflection on Literary Value within the Digital

After reading Hayles, Wright and Murray, it became clear that the way ‘literary value’ is policed, constructed, and categorised, along with the way we read and understand these texts are undergoing a period of dramatic change. The dissolution of the virtuous, literary ‘critic’, or policing ‘publisher’, who’s academic literary knowledge form the grounding for a valuation of texts, the power of ascribing a text’s ‘value’ seems to be shifting to the consumer. With the rapid rise of texts (across various media entities) available, and lower barriers to entry for ammeter authors, what makes an ‘author’ successful, or valued, is perhaps linked to both capitalist structures (which, perhaps, drive both publishers to value certain texts above others) and cultural pallets (which are now formed by the public, not ‘high-brow’ artists). It reminded me of the perceived ‘death’ of broadcast TV, which simulated this disintegration of the coherent, cultural palate which came hand in hand with the Netflixicafion of media diets. The consumer curates their digital diet, no longer policed by broadcasters. Is this a force for good?

Literary ‘lists’ and prizes are an attempt to separate the ‘professional’ from the ‘amateur’… which books are ‘good’, or worth reading, and those which aren’t. However, even so, with the rising density of published works, and unwavering power of conglomerates (google, amazon) these are, maybe, equally unsafe from changing consumer pallets and practices. Further points to think about (which I couldn’t include):

  • Amazon/ Google recommendation systems shaping consumer tastes, by ‘recommending’ books based on algorithmic taste- does this ‘lock’ people into boxes, preventing cross-disciplinary interaction?
  • How does Faucault’s ‘author function’ apply here? When does someone become an ‘author’ in the digital sphere?
  • How might Hayles’ discussion of  ‘hyperreading’ bear on the way we read texts? Does this trickle down to affect the ways texts are produced, or published (given the consumer impact on literary value)?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel