I recently learned of a paper on The Student Voice (likely capitalised, perhaps bolded) that reportedly recommends mandating end-of-course surveys for every course, with completion required in class. Currently, I conclude my courses by sharing the optional survey link, respecting students’ autonomy as adults to choose whether to comment. In-class mandates would likely increase response rates but through coercion, potentially under the instructor’s gaze.
Why are we so desperate to capture ‘The Student Voice’, valorising it as a unified, almost sacred entity, that we demand its use? Why the definite article, which frames ‘the student voice’ as a distinct – perhaps oppressed – construct, rather than diverse ‘student voices’?
Can’t students use their voices to say ‘no thank you’? Can’t we, as educators, also say ‘no thank you’? In-course feedback can help tailor teaching to specific students, and post-course feedback may inform professional judgement about course design (e.g., identifying less engaging or overly complex elements). However, we must surely recognise these are context-specific opinions, not universal truths.
Summary of concerns:
– The capitalised ‘Student Voice’ implies a serious, unified call for agency, but masks that survey responses are mere opinions, not a cohesive, weighty perspective.
– Requiring in-class surveys could limit adult students’ choice to opt out, potentially reducing ‘the student voice’ to coerced responses rather than voluntary expression.
– Surveys might prioritise wants (e.g., satisfaction) over needs (e.g., skills, support), possibly misaligning ‘the student voice’ with educational priorities.
– Heavy reliance on feedback may undervalue professional expertise, potentially positioning ‘the student voice’ as a consumerist check rather than a complement to teachers’ judgements.
P.S. I am reminded of this comment by MacIntyre about the educational value of being unresponsive to the student voice:
Universities have made a similar mistake. They have responded all too readily to an invitation to treat students as consumers to whose demands they ought to be responsive. But it is a primary responsibility of a university to be unresponsive, to give its students what they need, not what they want, and to do so in such a way that what they want becomes what they need and what they choose is choiceworthy (2001, page 15)
References
Alasdair MacIntyre (2001) Catholic Universities: Dangers, Hopes, Choices, in Robert E. Sullivan (ed.) Higher Learning and Catholic Traditions. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 1–21.
(Edvard Munch: Summer Night's Dream (also known as The Voice))
