Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.
By Karen Howie (Head of Digital Learning Applications and Media in Information Services)
 
A Friday at ALT-C

A Friday at ALT-C

I attended the Friday of ALT-C today and I’m glad I did, it was a very interesting and fun day.

Some brief highlights from me….

I learned a new term today which I thought was really poignant – ‘lifeload’ – sum of all pressures a student has in their life INCLUDING university – some people have a bigger lifeload than others and lifeload needs to be considered when thinking about inclusivity.  This was in a keynote by Gabi Witthaus where she was talking about rethinking inclusion. She made some really good points highlighting injustices as well as possible solutions and reflections.

Steph Comley and Cat Bailey from JISC ran a great workshop on piloting edtech tools – JISC are planning a framework and the workshop will feed into that. It was a great way to reflect on what works well/doesn’t work.

I then really enjoyed the presentation by Ruth Clark, Leeds Conservatoire, about how they moved from Mahara to WordPress for their student competency tracking.  Mahara wasn’t popular and it went from being free (& open source) to having a charge and that was the trigger for a rethink.  They felt WordPress was a good option and felt it also provided students with transferable skills given how much of the internet uses WordPress.

After that, another really enjoyable presentation by Johnny Briggs at Glasgow who was building immersive experiences but using simple technology like 360 images and video.  Although low tech, was much more accessible and widely usable.  Johnny had built some really cool stuff like a virtual tour of Wallace’s monument and was doing an accessibility tour of a new building at Glasgow, aiming to show building users with mobility difficulties how to navigate the building.

After lunch, a workshop about reviewing a VLE review toolkit developed by UCISA.  The penultimate session of the afternoon I went to was Joseph Spink from the University of Birmingham did a presentation on their business continuity plan.  It was really interesting, and quite similar to what we’ve been doing – which is always a relief.  He talked through their priority 1 incident process and what they did to create a Business Continuity Plan and Business Impact Assessment.  He highlighted the importance of reviewing these documents regularly because things change.

The final session I found particularly interesting and useful. Andrew Larner from Manchester Metropolitan and his colleagues had been working to review and provide advice on assessment in the age of AI.  They’d reviewed all the assessments in a department and attempted them with AI tools and then categorised them in a way which showed how easy it was to use AI to complete them and looked at the ones which had been harder and extracted the parameters of those to help them redesign the other assessments.

Summary of the work done and findings (really worth a look).

Then I headed home.  With thanks to Scotrail for getting me home …. Eventually…..

 

 

 

Share

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel