Week1&2 Sprint1:Open P2P
Based on the problem scenarios, I will make some observations.
-
Cooperation
First of all I would like to explain the basic concept of cooperation: a joint action, a way of cooperating with each other between individuals and individuals, groups and groups to achieve a common purpose.
It is a good way to advance teamwork tasks. In response to cooperation first we should think about teamwork, working together towards a goal until it is completed.
-
Open Cooperation
What is open collaboration?
Here I start with a new idea:peeragogy.This is a new way of learning proposed by Howard Rheingold and his partners,“it’s an open learning environment for people that are driven by selfmotivation of going somewhere with some others.”
So you can be involved in collaborative learning wherever you are. At the same time I am interested in this type of learning.
-
Tools
(1) Based on experience: I think it is possible to provide a public platform for meetings through online meetings, e.g. rooms,Tencent meetings. The aim is to allow every member to participate in the meeting regardless of time and place, and to express their views online through text or language.Meetings can be watched and recorded in real time, recording the entire meeting, making it easy for members to repeat and make further constructive comments on the discussion.
(2) Based on classroom practice: I think it is possible to create a communication platform through miro to build a collaborative system in real time, which is reflected visually and clearly in the miro board and supports members to synchronise their operations online in real time. Members can form their own logical framework through text or images, and finally a group member is responsible for organising and summarising it to form the final expression. (With this tool, members are not limited in the form of expression, and can create and express themselves through text, video, audio, web sites, etc.)
(3)Based on “further reading”: depending on time/place we can further break down the tools as to whether they are created or distributed, or whether we can work simultaneously (synchronously) or in our own time (asynchronously). To make the time and place element more intuitive, Baecker [8] created a CSCW matrix that combines the functions and requirements of time and place. Some tools are synchronous, such as Google+ Hangouts, Blackboard Collaborate and Adobe Connect, while others allow us to work asynchronously, such as wikis and forums. Google Docs can be used in both directions. We seem to be thinking here mainly of tools that are suitable for group work but not for working alone, while many other tools are easier to use alone or in smaller groups. Some tools are synchronous, such as Google+ Hangouts, Blackboard Collaborate and Adobe Connect, while others allow us to work asynchronously, such as wikis, forums and Google Docs.
In summary, online platforms are a great way to collaborate openly, depending on needs, preferences and other factors.
I would like to conclude by saying that open collaboration is a great way to learn from each other.
References:
- Schein, E. H. (1997). Organizational learning as cognitive re-definition: Coercive persuasion revisited. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning.
- Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Compeau, D.R., & Higgins, C.A. (1995, June). Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19, (2), 189-211.
In the article, I see that you have a comprehensive understanding of open learning. And you described very specific ways that how we can conduct open learning. But I think it’s a great thing to describe a bit more how you apply your ideas to the work of the basho group.
I think you have a deep understanding of the concept of ORE and toolkit at this stage, and can understand these contents systematically. But lack of critical analysis and ORE practice