Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

Learn

Learn

Information about updates to the University virtual learning environment.

Reflections on the LOUISA Project User Groups 

Reading Time: 2 minutes

 

Attending the first round of the Academic User Group (AUG) and Professional Services User Group (PSUG) meetings in late 2024 was a fantastic opportunity to connect with colleagues across disciplines, Schools, and Colleges. As a Learning Technologist, collaborating on assessment (re)design is a key part of my role, and these sessions provided valuable insights into assessment and feedback practices across the university.  

A recurring theme in our discussions was that many challenges we face are shared across disciplines and are platform-agnostic. Regardless of the tool – whether Learn, Turnitin, WebPA, PebblePad, STACK, Gradescope, or others – colleagues reported similar struggles with anonymised dropboxes, marks and feedback release, multimedia assignments, peer feedback, moderation, and managing extensions and exceptional circumstances. Group assignments emerged as another shared concern, particularly around fairness in contribution and assessment, as well as the lack of an integrated space for collaborative projects.

A text message dialogue, captioned: I am never doing a group project again. Person 1: Are you free at all this weekend? Person 2: I'm kind of already seeing someone Person: That's nice. We still have 8 slides to do.

Several colleagues expressed a desire to implement innovative approaches to assessment design – for example through multimedia submissions, open-ended tasks, or in-person assessments – but acknowledged the additional time and resources this would require. For me, this resonated with a key aim of the LOUISA project: to establish consistent and streamlined workflows and guidance for core assessment types, reducing the administrative workload involved and enabling colleagues to prioritise authentic assessment tasks and high-quality feedback.

Operating as we do within our individual schools and colleges, it was reassuring to find common ground in our challenges and concerns, and I appreciated the opportunity for open discussion, sharing good practice and identifying areas for improvement. I’m looking forward to our next sessions, where we’ll focus on marking, feedback, and the potential role of rubrics in enhancing assessment. 

Jamie Auld Smith
Learning Technologist 

Centre for Open Learning | Moray House School of Education and Sport 

Share

Leave a reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel