Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

The Lady with the Balloon Hat

The Lady with the Balloon Hat

Vagaries and Fancies around "Opening Romanticism: Reimagining Romantic Drama for New Audiences" (Grant agreement ID: 892230)

Editing Wikipedia Part 2

Today’s task was a follow up to my previous Women in Red wikipediathon, and I have done some pretty good work. (Flourish of own small trumpet.) I have added the section below (with image to boot), and several links to essential reference work, including Sophie Marie Coulombeau, ‘New Perspectives on the Burney Family’, Special issue of Eighteenth-Century Life 42, 2 (2018) ISSN 0098-2601; Mascha Gemmeke, Frances Burney and the Female Bildungsroman: An Interpretation of The Wanderer; or, Female Difficulties. Frankfurt/M: Peter Lang, 2004; Jacqueline Pearson, “‘Crushing the Convent and the Dread Bastille’: Anglo-Saxons, Revolution, and Gender in Women’s Plays of the 1790s,” in D. Scragg and C. Weinberg (eds), Literary Appropriations of the Anglo-Saxons from the Thirteenth to the Twentieth Century (CUP, 2000), 122–27. I also added my own essay, Saggini, Francesca. “From Evelina to The Woman-Hater: Frances Burney and the Joyce of Dramatic Rewriting, in Studi settecenteschi nr. 20, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 2000, pp. 315-33”. UnitusOpen.

As far as I am concerned, the Burney wikipedia page is a living work. I shall join the Women in Red over the next months to populate and, hopefully, improve  the Burney page. As our Wikimedian in residence, Ewan McAndrew, says, wikipedia “is the 8th most visited site in the UK, and 9th most visited globally (rankings by Alexa).” Let us see how Wikipedia can contribute to the public-facing impact of my project.


The Court Plays

Bodleian Libraries, Playbill of Drury Lane Theatre, Tuesday, March 10, 1795, announcing The merchant of Venice &c.


From 1788, Burney’s diaries record the composition of a small number of playtexts which were neither performed nor published in the author’s lifetime, remaining in manuscript until 1995. These are the dramatic fragment conventionally known as Elberta and three completed plays copied out in beautiful handwriting in ordered booklets, suitable for private circulation, if perhaps not publication. These are Edwy and Elgiva, Hubert de Vere, and The Siege of Pevensey. Edwy and Elgiva was the only one to be staged, although for one night only, on 21 March 1795, garnering unanimous negative reviews from the public and critics. The long-delayed publication of these plays has kept critics away, with the exception of very few.[28] Even for the handful of scholars who have dealt with them, these texts remain devoid of particular dramatic qualities, indeed ‘wretched’, as they are often called: in the form in which they have come to us they seem too long to be staged; characterizations are stereotyped; the endings are weak, and the plots convoluted and inconsistent. The style, rhetorical and emphatic, makes them sound clumsy and heavy to the modern ear. However, when properly contextualized and studied as theatrical texts, rather than as unfortunate second-order productions within the works of a successful novelist as Burney, the four Court plays suggest a distinct thematic-stylistic-discursive alignment, more in line with the dramatic production of the late 18th century than has been recognized thus far.[29]


Leave a reply


Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.