Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.
Crime, technology and society by Angus Bancroft
Questions about reading which are really about you, the reader, but are also about me, the writer

Questions about reading which are really about you, the reader, but are also about me, the writer

The kind of reading you do matters a lot to the kind of scholarship you are doing. The classic image of the scholar is someone poring carefully over a text, parsing each phrase and glossing every paragraph. A scholar isolated from the world around, unburdened by cares. I expect few academics can or do much of this close reading, though it can bear fruit. An intense reading of a text everyone refers to but everyone read so long ago that they have forgotten what is in it can be fruitful. What did Marx really say about the labour theory of value? Did he say it differently somewhere else? Did Foucault ever define what a clinic is? Questioning established common sense is a good habit and effective when you go back to the source. Be not cowed by what everyone knows.

There are many helpful guides to going about a literature review. I’m taking another approach here. These questions are a survey of reading habits and attitudes.  They are to allow you to reflect on the kind of reading you do. This is as much about who you are as a scholar as it is about the kind of research you are doing.

  1. Do you enjoy academic reading? What aspects do you like and what do you like less?
  2. Do you ever find the meaning or significance of a reading to be elusive? Is reading ever tiring or ever gives you a funny kind of distanced feeling in your brain? Is it time for a nap?
  3. Do you ever rely on someone else having read something and explained it? Do you sometimes still not ‘get it’ even after that?
  4. Do you ever feel guilty about reading? About what?
  5. What do you write when you are reading? Where do you keep your notes?
  6. Do you ever avoid primary texts and rely on secondary explanations, but pretend you have fully read and absorbed the primary text?
  7. What voice do you hear in your head when reading, if you hear one at all?
  8. Do you look at the bibliography of the text you are reading? Do you check their references?
  9. How often do you pause during reading? Do your reading aims grow faster than your reading capacity?
  10. Do you exclude readings based on titles or abstracts?
  11. What characteristics of a text do you find particularly appealing, and in contrast, are there any that are alienating? Be honest, we all hate something about the text and skip over it and hope that it wasn’t that significant or that the authors weren’t hoping you skate over it as well.
  12. Footnotes: yes or no?
  13. What’s the proportion of texts you cite to texts you have genuinely read?
  14. Do you ever run out of time to read? What do you do then? Do you ever spend too much time reading the first few pages and then have to rattle through the rest and hope it doesn’t contain any nasty surprises?

For further questions you can ask about your reading, this is a really good reflective tool which inspired my thinking for this blog post: Navigating the page. An academic guide to effective reading


Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.