Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

Reading Week | Awareness, a one-person show proposal that turns everyday objects into companionship and resistance (Guo Puyi)

1) Why Awareness, and why I am working with Guo Puyi

This week I decided to ground my individual curatorial project in a theme that is easy to understand and also realistic to deliver: awareness. For me, awareness is not something abstract. It is the moment when you suddenly notice how you have been looking at things in the same habitual way, and maybe treating yourself in the same way too.

 

I want to curate a one-person show with Guo Puyi because his work does something very clear. He takes objects that seem lifeless and without agency, and gradually makes them feel alive, spreading, and present. His practice makes me question whether my own way of living has become too utilitarian, too shaped by rules and efficiency. That reflection also connects to my background. I grew up in Shandong, where social norms shaped by ritual and propriety can feel heavy. Guo’s work is not loud, but it has a quiet force that suggests there are other ways to exist.

2) Three groups of works: from companionship to rupture, then beyond a human-centred gaze

To keep the project readable, I am organising Guo’s works into three groups. This helps audiences follow the exhibition without needing theory first.

 

Group 1: wood and ceramic works, a sense of companionship

These works include wooden figure-like building blocks and ceramic or hand-made objects. Although these materials often belong to domestic settings, Guo sees them as public-facing. His intention is to bring attention to small, easily ignored things in a fast urban life.

In our conversation, he described how giving non-agentic objects a sense of life can create a feeling of safety, as if he is surrounded by living presences. He sometimes treats everyday objects almost like pets. That idea matters for my theme, because it makes awareness practical. The way you relate to objects can reflect the way you relate to yourself.

 

A cluster that looks like a soft plant but is built from rigid modules. It suggests how connection grows: not as one perfect form, but as many small contacts holding each other up.

A small orange modular sculpture on a white surface. Flat, slotted petal-like pieces form a curved line, arching upward at one end and bending down at the other.

A smaller body, but the same logic: connection as a chain of decisions. The work reads like a creature mid-move, showing how objects can carry emotion without becoming “cute.”

An installation view in a white room: orange modular forms snake from the floor up into open drawers and across to a small cabinet. The pieces appear to “crawl” through the furniture.

Placed among drawers and corners, the work behaves like something that escaped storage and began to travel. It turns the domestic into a site of agency, not just comfort.

 

Group 2: ironworks and hard materials, making softness sharp

Here, the key is the tension between familiar imagery and unexpected material. Guo often chooses forms that, in daily life, suggest softness and comfort. But he makes them in iron or sharp-edged materials. For him this is not an aesthetic trick. It is a refusal of social habits and fixed assumptions. We often project our expectations onto objects, and we do the same to people.

By using a material that resists comfort, he pushes viewers to notice the object’s actual properties, and to adopt a more critical gaze. It becomes a practice of awareness in itself: looking for possibilities beyond an object’s assigned function.

 

A round metal cage sits on a circular base atop a white plinth. Inside is a white block with a smooth, balloon-shaped cavity. Thin metal rods arch over the form.

A balloon-like void held behind a metal cage. The work flips softness into restraint, asking how comfort can become surveillance when it is “protected” too tightly.

A metal staircase structure in a workshop environment. The steps are silver sheet metal with welded seams; red machinery and industrial surfaces surround it.

Not a finished artwork, but a key part of the practice: fabrication as thinking. The studio image foregrounds labour, tools, and risk—what gets erased when we only see the final display.

A tall, vertical sculpture on a white plinth. Dark metal polygonal frames interlock like modular joints, forming a totem-like figure against a plain wall.

A stacked figure made of interlocking metal frames, like a toy turned stubborn. It keeps the language of play, but the material changes the mood: playful forms can carry pressure.

Installation view in a white studio: at left, a tall black metal stand supports a circular metal cage containing a white block with a balloon-shaped cavity. Centre foreground, a stainless-steel rocking-horse-like sculpture rests on curved runners. To the right, two small modular steel figures stand on the floor, and one similar figure sits on a white plinth.

A small “family” of objects shares the same room but holds different degrees of freedom. A balloon-like void is kept inside a metal cage, while a rocking-horse body lies on the floor like a toy that has grown heavier than play. Nearby, modular steel figures stand upright, as if play has been reorganised into structure. In this scene, comfort, control, and companionship are negotiated through material weight and spatial distance.

 

Group 3: photography, works on paper, and leaf-based pieces, shifting attention outward

This group feels like a movement away from human-centred urgency. Leaves, paper, and photography pull attention back to nature and to something slightly beyond the material everyday. Guo mentioned Borges’s The Circular Ruins, which I see as a useful hinge for the later part of the exhibition: once you become aware of the weight of everyday objects, you may also realise you are not the centre of everything.

In Guo’s practice, the idea is materially built into the work. His piece titled Book is made from the English edition of The Circular Ruins, physically constructed so that the text becomes a continuous loop, with the beginning and the end connected. This matters because the book is no longer only something we read for meaning. It becomes an object with weight, density, edges, shadows, and a circular structure that you encounter through the body. The paper carries time. The form carries repetition. Meaning is not only in language, but in what the material does to language.

This shift brings awareness into a third layer. In earlier sections, awareness is about how we attach feelings to objects and how material reality interrupts our habits. Here, awareness becomes a small step away from the self. Borges’s story is already built around a loop: the dreamer creates a human through dreaming, only to realise he might also be someone else’s dream. By turning the story into a ring-shaped Book, Guo translates that narrative logic into tactile experience. You do not need to “understand the plot” to enter the concept. You simply face a structure with no clear starting point and no final destination, and you begin to feel—almost automatically—that you are not always the centre of everything.

For me, this group frames awareness as honesty. It is about trusting one’s own perception and touch, and staying close to the concrete world rather than turning awareness into a slogan.

 

A note on Mono-ha

I do not want to force this exhibition into Mono-ha, but Mono-ha gives me a clear curatorial lesson: treat material, weight, scale, and placement as part of meaning, and let viewers understand through bodily experience rather than over-explanation. Mono-ha, emerging in postwar Japan, foregrounded direct encounters with materials and the relationships between things and site. That approach helps me keep awareness grounded in how people look and move, not only in what they read.

 

A ball-shaped cluster of dried leaves rests on a white surface. Leaves in yellow, brown, and reddish tones overlap tightly, with stems and curled edges visible.

A compact bundle of fallen leaves: not decoration, but a record of time. It treats the “discarded” as something worth holding, like a small ritual of attention.

A small sculptural book sits on a tall white plinth against a pale wall. The pages are fanned into a circular or cylindrical form, creating a dense, textured surface.

A book opened into a solid form: reading becomes architecture. It hints that knowledge is not only content, but also a physical habit we build around ourselves.

A red square artwork placed against a white background. The surface shows dense, branching textures and lighter areas, resembling liquid spread patterns or organic veins.

A surface that looks like a spill frozen in time. It plays with the border between accident and control: when does a stain become a decision.

A framed blue artwork on a white wall. The image shows pale, vertical forms with dripping marks, like ghostly figures emerging from washes of pigment.

A “portrait” without faces: figures appear as washes and drips. The work suggests family as atmosphere—presence, distance, and emotional weather rather than fixed identities.

A blue-toned square artwork on a light background. White drips and cloudy bursts spread across the surface, resembling ink wash, water stains, or fireworks captured as traces.

A quiet “firework”: the burst is slowed down into stains and drips. It holds a tension between celebration and residue—what remains after the moment ends.

A black-framed artwork on a white wall. Inside the frame is an image dominated by deep reds and pinks, showing an architectural interior with arched shapes and light reflections.

A view that feels like looking into a contained room. The frame acts like a boundary: protection and separation at the same time, asking what we keep “inside” when we say we are safe.

 

3) Curatorial plan: a workable online 3D solo show, with budget and ethics in view

To keep the project feasible and aligned with a not-for-profit curatorial context, I plan to build this as an online 3D exhibition. The reason is practical: it reduces venue costs, transport, and insurance risks, and it allows audiences to access the exhibition from home. At the same time, I want to take digital barriers seriously. Arts Council England highlights that digital delivery can also exclude people, so online does not automatically equal public.

 

Exhibition pathway

Part 1 entering and getting close: wood and ceramic works as quiet companions

Part 2 friction and rupture: ironworks that reframe familiar forms through material resistance

Part 3 widening the gaze: photography, paper, and leaf works that shift attention beyond the self

How the 3D space stays meaningful

short labels for each work: material, size, one key question

one small prompt per section: for example, choose one object that makes you feel safer

accessibility basics: alt text for images, clear text versions for any audio or video

transparency: a simple note listing any support, collaborations, and how labour is recognised

How this connects to the Jì Jū Collective

Our collective ethics around transparency and labour will shape how I work with Guo: clear permissions, clear fee structure where possible, respectful crediting, and a clear statement of my curatorial position. Our collective practice also reminds me to actively invite peer feedback, especially on representation and digital accessibility.

 

Leave a reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel