Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

Brewing Ideas with Tea and Regulations: Preparing for May

Today Euwyn’s storm kept me company all day. It’s been one of those perfectly gloomy days where the rain seems endless, and the grey skies blend seamlessly with the horizon. While many would consider this the perfect excuse to curl up in bed, I decided to make the most of the cozy vibe. With a hot cup of tea in hand, I tackled the “Bank Indonesia Regulation” on “Cyber Security and Resilience.” Surprisingly, it turned out to be a pretty engaging way to spend my afternoon, especially since it ties directly into my upcoming dissertation preparation, officially starting this May.

From what I’ll focus on in my project, I carved out some key takeaways from the regulation that could form the groundwork for my research:

  1. Identification of Security Standards
    The regulation emphasizes the importance of following best practices. While it doesn’t explicitly reference international standards, I think frameworks like ISO 27001 are highly applicable, as they address confidentiality, integrity, and data availability. For my dissertation, I’ll likely analyze the standards mentioned in the regulation, compare them to others like NIST or COBIT, and identify any gaps relevant to the Indonesian context.
  2. Framework Design
    The regulation includes essential elements of cyber risk management, such as identifying critical assets, conducting periodic risk assessments, and mitigating threats with tech-driven strategies. This aligns well with my goal to develop a framework that integrates policy and technology, tailored specifically to the needs of PSPs (Payment Service Providers) in Indonesia.
  3. Audit and Supervision Procedures
    Another point of interest is the regulation’s requirement for internal and external audits to evaluate compliance with security standards and incident reporting to Bank Indonesia. This could inspire a section in my framework detailing effective audit processes, including incident reporting, key performance indicators (KPIs), and leveraging technology for streamlined oversight.
  4. Review of Best Technologies and Procedures
    The regulation encourages the adoption of advanced technologies like encryption, threat detection systems, and real-time monitoring. To deepen my analysis, I’ll explore technologies already used in Indonesia, compare them with global trends, and highlight innovations that could boost security and efficiency for PSPs.

After mapping these points, I realized the scope might be too broad. It’s a good reminder to stick to the plan I’ve laid out in my proposal—focus is key! I’m excited to meet with my supervisor soon to refine what specific aspects to delve into for my framework.

Alright, time to wrap up this post—thanks for sticking with me through these musings! Here’s to more gloomy days turning into productive moments. See you in the next blog post!

…and you can check the regulation here! (but i’m so sorry that it is in Bahasa Indonesia).

Previous

Connecting Digital Democratic Innovation with Practical Data Security Frameworks

Next

Cybersecurity in Indonesia’s Financial Sector: Gaps & Insights from the PADG

2 Comments

  1. Meera

    Yes, it very important to stay in focus so that the project remains within the decided scope. Its tricky because research will take you into new directions everyday, and while we enjoy those digressions, we need to keep coming back to the fundamental questions of the project!

    • s2764172

      Dear Meera! Thank you so much for your response. Yes, absolutely i already have questions to ask my supervisor! one of them is “How can i make it more narrow?” since i gotta think that my idea can be more compact.

Leave a Reply to Meera Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Brewing Ideas with Tea and Regulations: Preparing for May / Nadia Nur Amalina / Future Governance: KIPP & Futures Project (2024-25) by is licensed under a

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel