Feedback to two classmates’ blogs
Haonan’s blog extends from individual death experiences (Week 3 & 4) to collective memory (Week 5), incorporating philosophical perspectives such as Taoism, Sartre, and Beauvoir, thereby deepening the curatorial analysis. By referencing the Sisters! exhibition, he effectively bridges theory and practice. I find the discussion on digital mourning particularly compelling, but its application in exhibition design could be further explored. For instance, incorporating case studies on Facebook memorial accounts could strengthen the argument and provide a more concrete curatorial perspective.
Chuni’s blog evolves from Week 2’s exploration of multi-sensory immersive experiences, emphasising the impact of space, sound, and touch on audience perception, to Week 3’s analysis of Mire Lee’s Open Wound, which delves into the relationship between the human body and industrial processes. However, the tension between the organic and the mechanical could be further critically examined. Week 4 outlines the curator’s intention to adopt a non-linear narrative, allowing audiences to physically perceive the fragility and plasticity of life. Yet, a key question arises: Is the audience’s experience and reflection truly free, or is it subtly guided by the predetermined spatial design, materials, and modes of interaction?
My reflections on the group meeting
Yinuo proposed: I discussed that the primary audience for the exhibition is female, so what kind of reflections will they take away from it?
I hope it encourages them to reclaim control over their time, as time poverty is a universal issue but particularly acute for East Asian women. I also aim to inspire them to prioritize themselves, break societal expectations, and become the protagonists of their own lives.
Furthermore, in the third part of the exhibition, I plan to design an online platform to foster cross-cultural solidarity among women.
Leave a Reply