Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

1.3 Reflect on the programme core course and its relevance to the development of your project idea

I gained a small amount of experience working with law during my time in financial services, but I have never formally studied it. My programme’s core course, Data and AI Ethics, Law, and Governance, was my first exposure to law within an academic environment. I was pleasantly surprised; I had imagined law to be rather a tedious discipline, but I quickly saw we would not be memorising long, dry legal texts. During the course intensive, I really enjoyed thinking about how legislation can be interpreted in different ways.

In terms of AI and data law, the course has revealed and confirmed the stark inadequacy of existing legal frameworks to cover AI comprehensively. Before we even consider the law, we must tackle ethical issues that, until recently, were merely theoretical. But now these ethical dilemmas demand practical solutions. (A great example of this is the ethics of autonomous vehicles: once coined the “new trolley problem”, this ethical thought experiment is among the first to become reality.)

A moment which stands out is when John (the course instructor) explained that legislation in some areas works because it has been tweaked and perfected for centuries (e.g. economics, violence). With big data and AI, we are essentially starting anew. This underscored the considerable effort and dedication ahead of us which is required for successful AI and data governance. To examine the ethical challenges of 21st-century technology is not to open a can of worms, but Pandora’s box. Together, these facts could justify a new modus operandi.

══════════════════

While I haven’t settled on a final project idea yet, one idea that’s stuck with me is the proposal of a 98% income tax on AI companies. This concept can be attributed to Mo Gawdat, an entrepreneur and writer whose perspective on AI aligns closely with my own. While studying the core course I realised that radical problems require radical solutions, and few are as radical as the AI alignment problem. Gawdat’s proposal might therefore be a fitting solution, but the willingness of our politicians to take meaningful action leaves a lot to be desired.

 

Curated using ChatGPT 3.5 by OpenAI. For more information visit chat.openai.com.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel