Exhibition title
‘Rupture and Regeneration: Women’s Resistance and Reimagination’
Core concept/theme
This exhibition focuses on the works of Chinese female artists and explores the oppression, struggle and reimagination experienced by women in the family, society and workplace. Through a variety of media such as installations, paintings, videos and performance art, the artists present the tension between traditional and modern female identities and reflect on broader social issues through personal experience. Their works reveal the traditional expectations of women in the family, gender inequality in the workplace, and the social regulation of women’s bodies and identities.
The exhibition is divided into two core parts: ‘Family’ and ‘Society’, focusing on the identity dilemmas of women in the private sphere and public space respectively. The artist’s works are not only an expose of oppression but also a testimony of resistance and reinvention. They seek an escape from the shackles and sow hope in the cracks.
Methodology
The exhibition adopts a thematic curatorial approach, dividing the works into two sections: ‘Family’ and ‘Society’. The narrative approach guides the audience to understand how feminist art responds to social structures.
Interactive nature: Some works invite the audience to participate, such as Chen Sijia’s ‘Matree, Patree’, which symbolises the challenge to the patriarchal family structure through the audience’s ‘intervention’ in the work.
Multi-media presentation: The exhibition combines performance art (e.g. Zhang San’s Tying the Knot), installation (e.g. Wang Weijue’s She and Her), painting and embroidery (e.g. All you have given me are scars) to present multiple female experiences.
Critical discussion: Through their works, the artists ask questions such as ‘How is the position of women in the family defined?’ and ‘How do women resist invisible boundaries in society and the workplace?’
Curatorial text: Family
‘Home: a harbour or a prison?’
Traditional Chinese families have deeply rooted expectations of women, with marriage, childbirth and devotion shaping women’s identities and self-identity. This part of the exhibition explores the pressures women face in the family, the conflicts in their identities, and their rebellion against the family structure.
Zhang San’s series of works such as ‘Tying the Knot’ uses performance art to record how she replaces herself with a dummy to ‘get married’, symbolising a questioning of the institution of marriage.
‘One baby in each arm’ expresses the fear of women being urged to give birth through distorted images of babies.
‘Death Roots and New Blossoms’ expresses the struggle and rebirth of women under traditional discipline through the collection of hair, transforming ‘discarded body parts’ into new life.
There is also Chen Sijia’s ‘Matree, Patree’, which questions the tradition of patriarchy.
Wang Weijue’s ”she and her”, this series of works, made of red wool felt, shows the partial expressions of different female figures in the same language form. It reflects the health and emotional distress faced by women at the centre of their families and society.
Curatorial text: Society
‘Can women have true subjectivity in public space?’
Women’s voices in the public sphere are often silenced. Social control of women extends from the body to the workplace, and then to the struggle for public discourse rights. This part of the exhibition explores how women face workplace inequality, the social gaze on the body (male fixation), and how individuals can rebel.
Zhang Yisu’s ‘Start with the Cucumber’ uses performance art to simulate a mechanised work environment, exploring the reality of women being marginalised and undervalued in the workplace.
Ji Xiayu’s ‘Crime Scene’ uses installation art to present the silent suffering of women in sexual harassment experiences, inviting the audience to consider how to change society’s indifferent attitude towards gender violence.
Exhibition goals
Challenge traditional perceptions: The exhibition hopes to break down society’s inherent perceptions of women’s identities and provoke the audience to think deeply about family, the workplace, and social structures.
Build empathy: Through a variety of media, the multiple identities of women in society are shown, allowing the audience to feel the collective memory behind the individual experiences of the artists.
Stimulate discussion: Encourage the audience to discuss after the exhibition, think about how gender power relations affect individual lives, and how to bring about change in their daily lives.
In these works of art, we see the double predicament faced by women in the family and society. There are also works that reflect how women break free from the shackles of the family and fight in society. We also see them searching for themselves in the midst of their broken lives, and crying out their unheard voices in silence. Their stories are also the stories of countless women.
24 March 2025 at 01:17
Ruiqing Zhang’s Peer Review
Yilin, your current blogs show the progress of your curatorial project, from the initial concept to the meticulous implementation process. Your blogs embody a lot of research, understanding, and practice processes, especially in terms of feminism, family dynamics, and female social roles.
Firstly, your blogs always strictly analyze the theoretical text, clearly showing your in-depth understanding of important academic lists. For example, you effectively cite theories such as Bilbao and Ana’s Micro-Curating and Edward Said’s Orientalism to support your arguments on curatorial ethics, intercultural dialogue, and representational complexity. This was particularly prominent in the second week of discussions on cultural sensitivity and collaborative practices, effectively explaining how curatorial projects respond to cultural differences. Your theoretical research and integration of different academic resources add significant credibility to your curatorial projects.
Another notable advantage is your ability to reflect. You actively reflect on your position as an emerging curator, especially in the blog and subsequent reflections in Week 4. You clearly agree with Relly’s view of curatorial activity. Your reflection on the role curator should play in solving institutional bias and empowering marginal groups enriches your curatorial projects. This fully reflects your critical thinking.
In addition, the continuous selection and replacement of detailed art works reflect your continuous development and thinking about the content of the project. Each of your analysis presents your deep understanding of the work of art in emotion and theme, and clearly shows how each piece contributes to the overall narrative of female oppression and struggle. You explicitly point out the connection between the artwork and the exhibition scene, which not only strengthens your curatorial concept, but also ensures the theme coherence.
Regarding your exhibition theme, ‘Rupture and Regeneration: Women’s Resistance and Reimagination’, your blogs clearly illustrate the effective theme structure, and this division provides a clear and in-depth exhibition path that helps the audience interact with the exhibition. The discussion on site feasibility in the week 6 also comprehensively considers the actual limitations in safety and logistics, reflecting your thinking on the feasibility of the project.
However, your blogs and curatorial projects still have room for improvement in some aspects. Firstly, while your topic about Asian, especially Chinese feminist art is very convincing, it is more explicitly emphasized and consistently stated in the blog that this geographical specificity will avoid ambiguity. It is possible to further clarify the causes or importance of geographical restrictions, such as specifying a specific cultural background or social structure in China. (Recommended reference for Promising and Contested Fields: Women’s Studies and Sociology of Women/Gender in Contemporary China. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4149431)
Additionally, while your reflections on peer interactions with previous peer review processes (week 4, 5, and 8) may be more insightful, how peer feedback specifically affects your curation decisions may further enrich your reflections. For example, explicitly discuss how specific PEER suggestions can drive changes in your project, or highlight how the collaboration process directly affects your curation practice.
In addition, your discussions about audience participation in week 8 can be further improved, and you can take a step further into consideration possible challenges. For example, how does the sensitivity of some works of art affect the audience’s acceptance, especially audiences with large cultural differences? Proposing some strategies to address the possible resistance of a particular audience can ensure widespread participation of the exhibition.
Finally, as the exhibition emphasizes the female life experience, considering additional engagement elements in addition to text cues and interactive devices may further enhance the audience’s sense of participation. For example, holding a structured conversation or story sharing session that allows visitors to share their personal experiences related to the exhibition topic may deepen the impact of the project and expand its reach. (Recommended reference for Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. https://www.versobooks.com/en-gb/products/2251-artificial-hells） In addition, we can also think about whether there is further reflection in the future on how to evaluate the audience’s participation in the exhibition?
Overall, your blog reflects in-depth research, critical thinking, and detailed curatorial planning. Keep up with excellent and fun work!
Reference List：
Chow, E. N.-L., Naihua Zhang, & Jinling Wang. (2004). Promising and Contested Fields: Women’s Studies and Sociology of Women/Gender in Contemporary China. Gender and Society, 18(2), 161–188. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4149431
Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. Verso Books.