In 2003, mental health advocates bought complaints on behalf of patients detained at Campama, the only psychiatric inpatient facility in the Republic of The Gambia, to the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights. These complaints painted a bleak picture of the treatment of those with mental illness.
The case argued that the governing mental health law, known as The Lunatics Detention Act, was archaic and ineffective. Within the act there was no legal definition of ‘lunatic’ and no safeguards or provisions to protect those who would be diagnosed and detained under the act. Patients detained under the act had no right to vote or seek compensation if their rights had been violated.
Furthermore, the case highlighted the poor conditions at the Campama facility. Overcrowding was rampant and there was no process to independently examine the administration, management and living conditions within the facility.
Sadly, this case is simply a reflection of the social and political attitude towards mental health in Gambia.
Despite the fact that a significant number of people in Gambia are affected by mental illness (some estimates are as high as 13%), almost 90% of people with a severe mental illness do not have access to treatment. Mental health services in Gambia were not integrated into general health services. There was a clear lack of investment within mental health services. The government budget had no specific allocation for mental health, and the majority of the financing towards mental health comes from grants. Most of the funding available was redirected towards the upkeep of the Campama unit. Furthermore, lack of trained staff was also a major issue. None of the major health centres in the nation had specifically trained mental health workers, and a few providers in minor healthcare facilities had the knowledge and skills to provide adequate care.
The African Commission on Human and People’s Rights found The Gambia to be in violation of multiple articles of the African Charter.
Seventeen years have since passed. Has The Gambia changed its approach to mental illness?
In 2004, the Department of State for Health and Social Welfare in The Gambia, in conjunction with the World Health Organisation (WHO), detailed a plan aimed at ensuring effective and humane mental health treatment and care for the nation’s citizens. It aimed to do so by;
- Increasing awareness of mental illness
- Better mental health services
- Creating a supportive environment through engaging community leaders, traditional healers etc.
- Developing modern legislation to protect and promote the human rights of people with mental illness.
- Developing a mental health policy
Since then, some progress has been made.
In 2005, the WHO collaborated with the Department of State for Health and Social Welfare to arrange a technical workshop on mental health policy. This workshop included reviewing the mental health policy that was being drafted and commentary from WHO-trained technical workers was incorporated. The Gambia Mental Health Strategic Plan was implemented in January 2007 and planned to run until 2012.
As part of this plan, the Campama Unit was closed, and a new psychiatric facility opened in 2009. The Tanka-Tanka Psychiatric hospital has dedicated staff trained in providing cognitive behaviour therapy, psychotherapy, psycho education and individual counselling. On the occasion of World Mental Health Day, the hospital arranges workshops to train healthcare workers on how to psychosocial support. These workshops have been consistently held with the last workshop taking place in November 2020 with 500 attendees.
However, key recommendations by the African Commission have not been implemented.
Legal experts in The Gambia are frustrated that the Lunatic Detentions Act has not yet been repealed or amended. The draft Mental Health Bill that had been recommended by the Commission is still on hiatus at the National Assembly.
In 2012, the WHO summary Report on Mental Health in The Gambia stated:
“…Mental health services are very limited in the Gambia; there are significant gaps in capacity, human resources, materials, medication and outreach services, most of which stem from very limited budget allocation (about 0.5% of the national health budget is spent on mental health services)”
Though the opening of the Tanka-Tanka hospital was a significant milestone, no further psychiatric units or hospitals have been opened since.
The mental health crisis is predicted by some to be the next pandemic. Historically, infectious disease and maternal health were considered to be the major healthcare issues in low- and middle-income countries (LAMIC)s. However, the WHO have identified that ‘there is no health without mental health’ and that mental health is becoming a large proportion of the disease burden in LAMIC. Though the pandemic has necessitated diverging the budget towards controlling the spread of COVID-19, mental health must not be forgotten. Further investment is needed to ensure that the 118,000 people with mental illness receive adequate treatment and care.
s2264981
11th October 2021 — 10:28 pm
It is great to see that progress has been made related to training staff of the new psychiatric hospital in Gambia. I can see why legal experts would be frustrated that the Lunatics Detention Act has not been repealed or amended. It sounds like some work may be needed in reducing stigma around mental health problems and illnesses and increasing access to a variety of supports connected to primary care, etc.
Raina
14th October 2021 — 8:22 am
Thank you for this very interesting and relevant post. It is sad to read that mental health services are so limited in the Gambia and that the process of improvement is so slow and done with little effort. At least some progress has been made and training has improved.
Amy Alexander
14th October 2021 — 4:44 pm
Hello Basma, I very much enjoyed reading your blog. You’ve presented a clear picture of the slowly evolving situation in The Gambia when it comes to approach mental health. The statistics are astonishing and it’s sad to read that the recommendations of the African Commission have not been followed through and the Lunatics Detention Act remains in place. I also fear that the situation may have gotten much worse since COVID-19, you raise the point around budgets being directed toward containing the pandemic, I would also imagine a detrimental impact on those services available at the Tanka-Tanka Hospital, especially the workshops and training that you’ve highlighted. It’s difficult to know how to address the problem, especially given the WHO are already working with The Gambia’s government department as you’ve outlined. Thanks for bringing this NCD health challenge to our attention, you’ve helped to better my understanding of an issue I was previously unaware. Best, Amy
s2263421
17th October 2021 — 6:18 pm
Hi!It’s nice to read your blog.Do you assume that mental health lies with city?If not,what do you think to be the cause of mental health?
s2126244
18th October 2021 — 6:05 am
Really appreciate you shedding a light on an often overlooked aspect of health in developing countries. As pointed out in the blog, mental health isn’t given its due importance, and when it is, it’s led by half-hearted efforts. This is evident from the fact that there has been no actual progress on the Mental Health Bill draft presented in Gambia’s National Assembly. While resources have been shifted to COVID, it is unfortunate that the very real mental health implications of the pandemic have been ignored in all efforts.