Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

Bethany Hickling: Geoscience Outreach and Engagement (2021-2022)

Month: March 2022

Final Thoughts

Yesterday, I delivered the final lesson of my sequence of five. In this blog post, I will reflect on how my last three lessons went, and any adaptations I made. I will also discuss my experience of the Outreach and Engagement course as a whole, and how this has influenced my future plans.

Lesson 3

In my third lesson, we collected in all the traps that we had left out over the weekend. I was very pleased that the sampling method using the yellow bowls had been successful – despite it being relatively early in the season for insects to be around. The sampling method is known to be effective, as the yellow colouration actively attracts insects (Vrdoljak and Samways, 2011), though I think the warm and sunny weather also helped a great deal!

Generally, the students were initially quite disgusted at the insects they found, with comments bouncing round such as “eww”, “gross”, and “it looks slimy”. However, the majority managed to get over these feelings relatively quickly, after looking closer at the insects, and focussing on identifying them. All students managed to record the abundance and diversity of insects that they had trapped. The plenary activity at the end of the lesson involved students reflecting on something that they had done well in the lesson, and something that they had not done so well / had found hard. I had originally planned for students to write these points down on Post-it notes; however, given that we were running out of time, I conducted this as a quick-fire class discussion, instead. Many students thought they had done well to get the insects out of the pan trap, and manipulate them to identify and count them. It seemed that the students were pleased that they overcome their initial reaction of disgust.  Most students commented that the hardest part of the lesson had been trying to identify the insects. Indeed, this is something that takes a lot of practice. Most students got the hang of identifying whether an organism was an insect, based on the number of legs the organism has, but found identifying the different kinds of insect more challenging.

Circulating around the classroom, I found that some students were also finding it difficult to record insect diversity in the template data table. Thinking quickly, I helped students with this by covering the bottom half of the table containing additional sections.  I then asked the students to count how many different insect groups they had recorded by counting how many rows they had filled in in the table. I explained that each row in the table was a different insect group, so by counting the number of rows that they had filled in, we could work out the insect diversity. This worked well, and helped students better understand how to record insect diversity in the table.

One student commented, “This is so strange”, and at the end of the lesson someone else told me “I enjoyed that lesson”. The students’ enthusiasm, motivation, and comments made me think that they had enjoyed doing something different, in the form of a practical activity, the likes of which they had not previously been involved in.

Lesson 4

In the fourth lesson, I had initially planned for the students to make a graph, interpret their graph, and decide whether we could draw fair conclusions. However, we did not manage to cover the section on fair conclusions as quite a few students arrived late to the lesson from their previous class. Also, the students found making the graph very tricky. Instead of rushing them, and moving on to the next part of the lesson, I decided that it would be best to spend more time on the graphs to make sure that the students had properly understood their results, and had something to present in their poster. I was pleased that I did this as, at the end, all students were successfully able to present their graphs and interpret their results. I think if I had rushed on to cover the other section of the lesson, students would only have partially met each of the two learning objectives (present and interpret data in graphs, and draw fair conclusions) instead of fully meeting the one important objective (present and interpret data in graphs).

I made graph templates to help the students complete the graph, after their teacher advised me that the class I was teaching had struggled with graphing data in the past. The graph templates I made were extremely effective in helping the students to plot their results and understand their data.

The graph templates I made for the students to fill in. The template contained axis with an appropriate scale for their data, and were pre-labelled.

The class I was delivering my project to had never done compound graphs before – and the graph templates I made were a very good tool to help them do this. I had wanted to include compound graphs in my lesson, because a benchmark of one of the Level 3 mathematics Es&Os  (MTH 3-20b and MTH 2-21a/3-21a) that I was covering was:

Organises and displays data appropriately in a variety of forms, for example, compound bar and line graphs and pie charts, making effective use of technology as appropriate”.

Learning from my experience, in the future, teachers delivering this lesson to an S1 class that are relatively new to compound graphs, should do as I did and cut the fair conclusions part out of the lesson, in order for students to have more time to plot and understand what their graphs show. However, if the lesson is being delivered to S2 students, then the second part of the lesson could be incorporated, as these students will have had more practice drawing graphs, and will be quicker at understanding how to plot and interpret a compound graph. I think the lessons I have planned allow sufficient flexibility for this to happen.

Lesson 5

In my last lesson, I asked the students to complete any sections of their poster that were unfinished. We then looked at the future of insects. The students seemed to enjoy researching entomological careers, and many were surprised and intrigued at some of the ones they found – such as a forensic entomologist! They seemed excited about downloading the iNaturalist app to identify insects and contribute to scientific records out of school – it was quite difficult to stop students getting their phones out to download the app before the end of the lesson! At the end of the lesson, I asked the students to fill in a feedback form, using the 4,3,2,1 approach, in which I asked them to note down four new facts or skills that they had learnt in my lessons, three words they would use to describe insects now that they have completed the project , two activities they enjoyed over the five lessons, and one thing that they will do in the future to help insects. I also asked them if there was anything that they had not enjoyed. Overall, I received really positive feedback, and the students seemed to have picked up most of the knowledge and skills in the lessons’ learning objectives. I will reflect on the feedback I received in further detail in my Technical Report.

Overall reflection

This has definitely been the most rewarding course I have taken whilst at university. Going from students thinking that insects are “scary” and “disgusting” at the start of the first lesson, to describing insects as “interesting”, and “helpful” at the end of the last lesson made me feel like I had made an impact on the students understanding, and had achieved my goal of raising awareness, and sparking interest in, what is often a very overlooked and underappreciated animal group.

Though my plans are currently to go into the field of ecological consultancy, completing the Geosciences Outreach and Engagement course has made me want to continue communicating ecology to a public audience, children and adults alike, as I found it to be highly rewarding. I will continue to raise awareness of my love of ecology on my nature-themed Instagram account, and in my spare time, I aim to be involved in outreach volunteering projects. To this end, I have already signed up to volunteer at weekends as part of Northumberland Wildlife Trust’s “Osprey Watch”. I will staff an osprey visitor hide, and communicate facts about these birds, and why they are important. I am sure the experience of planning my “Insect Investigation” project, and delivering my lessons will serve me well in providing an engaging visitor experience. For example, from my first lesson containing the insect quiz, I realised just how impactful startling facts can be in capturing people’s interest, and getting them to want to find out more. This is a tactic that will definitely prove useful when trying to communicate about the ospreys to hide visitors.

I look forward to spreading awareness about another aspect of ecology, and I will hopefully inspire even more people to take an interest in the natural world.

References

Vrdoljak, S. M. and Samways, M. J. (2011) ‘Optimising coloured pan traps to survey flower visiting insects’, Journal of insect conservation, 16(3), pp. 345-354.

Adapting and learning

Yesterday, I delivered the second of my 5 lessons. The students and I are currently waiting for the pan traps to (hopefully!) collect some insects. Whilst we wait, I will reflect here on how my first two lessons went, the adaptations I have made, and points that I will take with me into my last three lessons.

Lesson 1 Activities

My first lesson introduced students to insects, and I managed to dispel some common misconceptions. Many students thought spiders were insects, and after watching the video I made on ‘What is an insect?’, they realised that actually, since spiders have four pairs of legs, and insects have three pairs of legs, spiders are not insects at all. The ‘Who’s Who’ activity helped students to see a greater variety of insects, showing them that not all insects are “spiky” and “disgusting” – as some students originally had thought! Some students were sometimes a little unsure of how to complete the activities I had set, but when I went round and explained again, or gave little prompts, all students managed to complete the activities. In fact, there were some excellent justifications given for the diamond ranking of threats to insects. A particularly good response was “I put light pollution near the bottom because it doesn’t happen during the day, only at night, so only affects insects at night, but climate change happens all the time”. This kind of ‘out the box’ thinking was exactly what I had wanted to encourage, and I was pleased that the activity prompted students to do this.

Timings

Unfortunately, at the end of the first lesson, I ran out of time, and there was not enough time for students to fill in the background information section of their poster. I think I was not sufficiently aware of my timings, and I let myself be led off on tangents by students, with questions such as whether praying mantises and Komodo dragons were insects, and if we’d still be able to have crisps without insects pollinating potatoes! I didn’t want to not answer students’ questions as I felt it was important to engage them from the start, but I had not built a contingency into my lesson timings for this. In the second lesson, I made sure to keep better track of time and build some leeway into the lesson for students’ questions. I was more aware of when students were leading me off topic, and I managed to get through everything I had planned for the lesson. Also, before teaching the next session, I managed to adapt the second lesson, and allocate time for students to fill in the background information section of their poster, which we had not had time to do in the previous lesson. I was pleased that this had been possible and worked well, as it put my planning back on track, and made the objectives attainable once again.

Hypothesis construction

In the second lesson, all students managed to place their trap in their designated habitat, and record plant diversity, thus achieving the learning objectives of the lesson. The students did seem to struggle with formulating their own hypotheses. However, with prompts from both me and their teacher, and the support I had prepared on my PowerPoint to cover this eventuality, all students accomplished this, and some even managed to come up with hypotheses of their own, which was very pleasing. One student suggested that the rough grassland habitat would have more insects than the scotch broom habitat because there are more colours in the grassland, so more insects would be attracted to it. This was an idea I had not considered, and I was very impressed by the student’s creativity.

An unforeseen challenge, and new adaptations

A challenge that I had not foreseen, was students who had been absent from the previous lesson(s). There were a few students who were present in the second lesson, who were not present in the first which presented me with the challenge of how to include them and support them in the lesson. I overcame this by briefing these students as a group and individually, giving them an overview of what we had done in the previous lesson. I also got the students in their group to tell them what they had learnt. This not only helped the student who had been absent, but also seemed to consolidate the other students’ learning, and I was pleased with how well it worked as a strategy. This was borne out by the fact that all students were able to complete the background information section of their poster, regardless of absence from the previous lesson.

One thing that I have decided to change following delivery of my second lesson is not to ask students to re-write the diversity value that they recorded on their practical instruction sheet, on a class data sheet. I realised that this took up unnecessary time for little gain, as I could just collect in the practical instruction sheets, upon which students had already recorded their data.

Actions for future lessons

In my final three lessons, I will continue to identify adaptations that I can make to improve my lessons, and I will make sure to continue to be more aware of timings. I will also continue the practice of circulating around the classroom, and helping individuals at their desks. They seem to find this helpful as maybe I am more approachable. Giving further prompts and examples to what is on my PowerPoint presentations clearly supported students in completing the activities I set, and I think this approach will work for other activities in future lessons.

Preparing for Delivery

Last week, I finished making all of the PowerPoint presentations for my 5 lessons, the accompanying resources, and lesson plans. I go to Liberton High School in two weeks’ time to put my work into practice. Therefore, I thought it would be an appropriate time to reflect on the challenges that I have faced whilst planning the lessons. I will detail how I am overcoming these challenges, so I can be fully prepared for delivering my lessons later this month.

Keeping to time

The main challenge I have had has been lesson timings. Due to the school’s timetable, the lessons I have planned have had to be 40-50 minutes long. With these relatively short timings, it has been difficult to fit everything into the lessons that I would ideally have wanted, especially with the lessons involving practical activities outside the classroom. As a result, I have tried hard to ensure that the practical activities will run as quickly and smoothly as possible by making instruction handouts, with short, concise descriptions, and clear diagrams for those who have more difficulty reading or understanding.

A screenshot of a section of the lesson 3 practical instruction handout

I have also had to shorten some activities, and think of ways to prevent unnecessary time from being taken up. For example, I have decided to hand out certain worksheets at the beginning of the lesson, and pre-cut activity cards (such as those for the diamond ranking), so that they can be handed out in envelopes, ready to be used straight away. I have also found it difficult to gauge how long to plan for verbal discussion of topics, as I am unsure how confident the class will be in feeding back their answers to me. If necessary, I can adjust my timings after delivering the first lesson, once I have a better idea of how the class will respond to discussion activities.

Catering for different abilities

Another challenge has been ensuring my lessons are aimed at the correct level for students’ ability. I have been using the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence to identify concepts that students should already know. In doing so, I have been able to include refresher activities for certain concepts which I think students may need reminding of. For example, in my fourth lesson, I have included a starter activity on distinguishing between independent and dependent variables, by getting students to decide which variables in our experiment were independent, and which were dependent. This will hopefully set a strong foundation for the students’ learning. I have tried to make the lessons accessible to students of all abilities, not only by using a mixture of text and diagrams in instructions (as mentioned above), but also by providing supporting resources to those who may benefit. I will discuss potential students for these resources with the teachers. For example, in the lesson where we analyse the data, I will produce template graphs with pre-made axis titles, labels and scales for students who may otherwise struggle with this activity. I hope that by trying to cater for a full range of abilities, I will keep the students engaged as they will not feel unable to complete any activities. This will hopefully maximise their learning.

Minimising uncertainties

A final challenge that I have faced is the unpredictability of how many insects we will sample. I expect that there will not be many insects active in mid-March compared to the optimum time for sampling in summer months. I am also uncertain as to whether traps may be tampered with, or affected by weather conditions. I am going to try and reduce this uncertainty by bringing in pots of insects that I collected from two different habitats for my dissertation, for students to identify. This will ensure that students can still practise their insect identification skills, and meet the learning outcomes of the lesson. It may be exciting for them to see a sample of my own research. I have also produced a dummy dataset, with data that I have made up, that reflects differences in insect abundance, diversity, and plant diversity between two habitats. This will mean students can still practise their data analysis and presentation skills, even if we collect insufficient data ourselves.

Adapting

By trying to foresee potential challenges, and minimise uncertainties, I have ensured that I am as prepared as possible for delivering my lessons. As I progress through delivering my lessons, I will continue to reflect. I have allocated time for me to adapt my lesson planning accordingly should any new issues or challenges arise, as I see how quickly the students learn, how they react to me, and how effective my resources and delivery are.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel