Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

My KIPP Blog – Week 6-9

In my previous blog, I mentioned my research interest in studying the impact of digital inclusive finance on China’s rural-urban income inequality. After reading through some literature, I found that there is still controversy over whether digital inclusive finance can effectively narrow the income gap between rural and urban areas. While some researchers argue that digital inclusive finance has indeed reduced the income gap by lowering transaction costs, reducing barriers to financial services, increasing the possibility of entrepreneurship, and controlling financial investment risks by reducing information asymmetry, others believe that its promoting effect on rural economy is limited and may even widen the income gap between rural and urban areas. This is due to the possibility of digital divide, regulatory loopholes, and the uneven development of digital inclusive finance in China.

 

Therefore, in addition to theoretical analysis, a quantitative approach is necessary to explore this issue. Firstly, descriptive statistical analysis can be used to depict the development status of digital inclusive finance. Visualization tools such as heat maps can also be utilized to analyze the current situation. Secondly, fixed effects models can be used to analyze the factors that affect the urban-rural income gap, which is the method used in most literature. The dependent variable is the Theil index, which measures income inequality. The explanatory variable I plan to use is the digital inclusive finance index released by Peking University. Furthermore, I am considering using DEA efficiency models to evaluate whether the government’s investment in digitalization and infrastructure construction is sufficiently effective. The input variable is the investment made by each province in digitalization, infrastructure construction, and other relevant areas, while the output variable includes coverage breadth, usage depth, and digitization degree. However, the DEA model requires a lot of data and the correct selection of input and output variables to accurately evaluate efficiency. By exploring these three areas, I hope to identify the key influencing factors and mechanisms, and provide targeted recommendations.

 

Also, I had the first meeting with my supervisor to establish the timeline and task arrangement. Currently, I need to write a lengthy abstract of the references according to his requirements and provide him with a preliminary outline for feedback.

Leave a reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel