Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

Learn

Learn

Information about updates to the University virtual learning environment.

Details April 2026

Reading Time: 5 minutes

Automations

Review both sets of Discussion due dates across multiple views in Learn

When instructors create a discussion with two due dates and participation requirements, both sets of requirements appear on the Course Content page, Discussion pages, the Gradebook student and instructor views, and the instructor’s Discussion analysis panel. Students can track expectations throughout the workflow without navigating back to the discussion itself.

Image 1: On the Course Content page, both due dates and participation requirements are displayed. For all entry points for Discussions, both dates and requirements are displayed.

blackboard-instructor-discussions-2nd-due-date.png
  • On the Course Content and Discussion pages, both due dates and their requirements appear together for quick reference.
  • In the Gradebook student view, both dates appear.
  • Instructors also get a new Due Dates and Requirements section in the grading view for an individual student. This section shows both due dates and the student’s progress toward each requirement.

 

Add Substantive and Non‑substantive Content labels in instructor discussion analysis

Student posts and replies now have Substantive Content and Non-substantive Content labels in the instructor discussion analysis page. The labels clarify the meaning of the green and red highlighted text indicators in student responses and improve the grading process for instructors.

When instructors review a student’s posts and replies, the instructor analysis page displays text labels with highlighted content. Green highlights include a Substantive Content label. Red highlights include a Non‑substantive Content label. The labels appear consistently across the analysis panel and meet accessibility requirements.Image 1: Instructor analysis view showing posts labeled Substantive Content and Non‑substantive Content.

A Discussion topic in the Instructor Analysis view that shows a student's post shaded in green with the label Substantive Content at the top left corner of the response shaded in green.

Specify assignment submission type

New submission options have been added for instructors to specify the type of submission they expect from students, giving them a choice from file upload or text entry.

When creating or editing an assignment, instructors can define the expected submission type to guide how students submit their work.Instructors can select one or more expected submission types when configuring an assignment:

  • File upload
  • Text entry

By default, File upload and Text entry are both selected.

The selected submission type is visible in assignment settings and student‑facing details. Instructors can change the selected submission type until students have started submitting attempts.

Image 1: Instructors can choose one or more submission types when configuring an assignment.

The Assignment Settings panel has the Allowed format for online submissions setting with the two options being file uploaded and text entry.

Students are informed of the expected submission type and see a submission workflow optimised for that format.

  • File submissions display a dedicated file drop zone where students can upload, preview (when supported), and remove files.
  • Text submissions provide a streamlined rich text editor experience without a general file attachment option and include access to the Content Market for supported tools.

Image 2: Students have a submission workflow optimised for the selected submission type.

Student view of the assignment submission window. Because the instructor had selected "File" for the submission type, the student can only upload a file for their submission.

 

Improvements to multiple choice and multiple answer questions

  • For the multiple choice question, the default number of answer options has been modified so a student can select from 4 to 1.
  • When creating or editing a multiple choice or multiple answer question, instructors can change the number of answer options that a student can select.
  • Multiple choice answer options alphabetical labels (A, B, C, D) have also been restored.

Adjust grades for individual student attempts in group submissions

With Flexible Grading  an instructor can now adjust attempt grades for individual students within a group submission. This update ensures that grades for group submissions can accurately reflect each student’s individual contribution, even when work is submitted as a single group attempt.

Instructors can override a group attempt score for individual group members directly from the grading interface. The interface clearly indicates when grades differ across group members, and adjustments can be removed by restoring a student’s grade to match the group attempt score.

Image 1: Instructors can adjust grades for individual students within a group submission.

In the grading view, the Groups panel on the left side shows the groups that have a submission. The submission itself is displayed in the middle of the screen. On the right-side feedback panel, instructors can insert a grade and feedback for each student in this group.

Student names display in chosen sort order in Flexible Grading

Known Issues

This release will look to fix a couple of known issues. The first relates to rubrics using points, where the total points possible are sometimes rounded inconsistently, depending on the order of the criterion values. This has now been resolved, and total rubric points should calculate consistently regardless of the order in which criterion values are entered.

The second issue relates to group and individual feedback from group assignments. When a user views feedback from the Gradebook, only their individual feedback would show with the group’s feedback not displaying. This release will fix that, so that individual and group feedback will both correctly display for users when viewing their group’s attempt.

Share

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel