Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

Mental Health – Imagining Beyond

Mental Health – Imagining Beyond

A collaborative project between The Community Wellbeing Collective, Westerhailes and Mental Health Data Scientists at the University of Edinburgh. Funded by Research Data Scotland.

How do you deal with stress? Part 4: Results

[This part of the project was completed by Sarah Norman and Rumilla Uddin, in collaboration with Dr Iona Beange and Dr Pippa Thomson of The University of Edinburgh and the Community Wellbeing Collective.
This post follows on from How do you deal with stress? Part 3: Researcher Feedback & Pilot }

Data Collection Process

We invited people to write down their answers in a colour and format of their choosing on a blank piece of paper, rather than giving them a pre-designed form to fill in. Answers were written down anonymously, but people were invited to openly discuss whatever they felt comfortable with sharing afterwards; instead of doing one discussion phase at the end, we facilitated a short one at the end of each question, while their experiences and reasoning were still fresh in their minds. Although every participant’s list of stressors was unique, there were many common threads. Therefore all of the answers given to question 1 can be grouped into categories:

 

Emotional States:

Fear – 15

Worry – 100

Uncertainty – 30

Lack of control – 50

 

Social & Relational Challenges:

Peer pressure – 10

Needless pressure – 10

Toxic/unhealthy relationships – 75

People that lie – 20

Aggressive authority – 60

People misunderstanding me (managers) – 20

Disrespect – 35

Discrimination – 35, 40

Injustice – 25

 

Feelings of Being “Behind”

Not knowing what I need to know – 50 (chronic)

Lack of planning – 60 (chronic)

Dealing with other peoples’ lack of timeliness – 70 (acute)

Being late – 100 (acute)

Time pressure – 90

Lack of time – 30

 

Family 

Having to manage elderly parents – 40 (chronic)

Parental stuff – 50

Supporting friends with their problems – 50

Too many needy children at once – 45

Misbehaving pets – 15

 

Health & Wellbeing Concerns:

Managing a long term disease I can’t control – 30 (chronic)

Health – 100

Health concerns incl family – 100

Poor sleep – 20

Not getting enough sleep – 10

Death – 35

 

Technical challenges:

Tech not working – 40 (acute)

Websites not working – 5

 

Feelings of overwhelm:

Too many tasks at once – 75

Responsibilities (work + voluntary work, admin incl personal, life) – 50

Too many commitments – 30

Sensory overload – 90

 

Challenges in the Home Environment:

Mess and clutter – 40

Keeping my home tidy and functional – 15

Home losing heat – mould – 20

Not having enough space – 40

 

Personal Responsibilities:

Paperwork – 30

Future planning – 70

Money spend – 50

 

Reflections on the Data

 

We really see the value of having personal discussions of lived experience to contextualise the numbers in the entry “future planning”; on its own this could be interpreted as a general stressor, but we know from context provided during the discussion phase that this is actually a reference not to trying to plan a future to live in, but actually planning a future in which this person may or may not be alive due to a battle with terminal illness. When we see this data through the lens of lived experience, our approaches to managing this stressor may differ completely.

Another example of this is the entry “death”, which without context may have been assumed to be a bereavement and grouped in the “social and relational challenges” or “family” categories, but that we learned from listening to the participant in the discussion phase actually referred to the notion of their own death.

One person chose to add whether each stressor was chronic or acute for them in addition to assigning each stressor a number. This ovided additional insight into their lived experience and perception of their stress; while some were intuitive, for example “being late” being labelled an acute stressor, “not knowing what I need to know” and “lack of planning”, which may at first appear to be acute stressors, were in fact described as chronic. 

Two participants listed “discrimination” as a stressor, both at similar levels; one person rated it at 35, and the other rated it at 40.

 

Whats next?

 

  • Dr Pippa Thomson has included reference to this work in a recent research grant pre-application and as a result of these conversations, included social isolation as a key influence across her research questions.
  • Although Pippa originally recommended a 1-10 stress scale, she is now more open-minded about a larger 1-100 scale and the advantages this could bring.
  • Discussions are ongoing around how Sarah and Rumilla may be able to continue to be involved in stress/mental health research.
  • The Community Wellbeing Collective continues to host wellbeing discussions and to be a place where anyone can come to feel accepted and listened to. 

 

Related Blog Posts

How Do You Deal With Stress? Part 1: Selecting the question

How do you deal with stress? Part 2: Designing Questions

How do you deal with stress? Part 3: Researcher Feedback & Pilot

 

 

 

(Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay)

(Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay)

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel