Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

Week11_Final_Presentation_Yuan_Mei

This week, before our final presentation on Wednesday, our project had to make a significant decision. We decided that having a non-linear loop structure would be most advantageous for our installation. This decision is made because the pace of audience interaction with the level button cannot be predicted. We don’t want audiences to rush through all the levels. Such a result would not align with our project idea and goals. 

Choosing a non-linear looping structure reduced the user’s risk of moving quickly through each level and prevented the viewer from prematurely ending the immersive experience. Therefore, our project did not end at the last peaceful level, followed by a cycle of four levels starting with the viewer’s interaction with the main controller buttons. This change ensures that audience engagement remains dynamic and allows for a more immersive and controlled experience.

In addition, we received valuable feedback from the audience during the final presentation. Based on the feedback, we took action quickly to enhance our project’s clarity. One insightful suggestion was emphasising the theme, ensuring audiences catch the project’s idea. We promptly designed and displayed a poster at the entry point to address this. This placement ensures that every visitor to the room is immediately introduced to our project’s theme, fostering better understanding and engagement right from the start.

Another valuable feedback suggested relocating the instructions for interacting with the sensors to the top of the box rather than placing them aside. This adjustment significantly enhanced the audience’s experience, making the instructions more readily accessible and easily read while engaging with the sensors. By implementing this improvement, we ensured that participants could quickly understand how to interact with the sensors, facilitating a smoother and more engaging experience for everyone involved.

           

Additionally, we received suggestions for further enhancement during submission 2. One suggestion addressed the narrow frequency range, particularly the underutilization of the high frequency across some levels. This feedback prompted us to make adjustments to ensure a better listening experience. By implementing sounds in different frequency ranges across the levels, the project will be optimized, having a richer and more dynamic auditory experience for our audience.

Below are some short videos that we recorded during the presentation.

Interaction:

Location setup:

 

 

Leave a Reply

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel