Each individual has a different relationship with place, and they tend to be both complex and dynamic and involve an entire series of dimensions that continue to shape and reshape how different situations present themselves to us. (Janz, 2017)
With this, we can say that our relationship with place is not just a matter of physical proximity or geographical location, but instead is a subjective and experiential phenomenon. “We all see the place differently, this varies depending on different factors, such as our individual memories, cultural context, historical background, and sensory perception. With this, our relationship with place is constantly evolving, and its reshaped every day by our day to day experiences.
Marc Augé (Augé, 1995) defines a “place” as a space that possesses a distinct identity and significance. They are enriched by social, cultural, and historical meaning and foster a sense of community and belonging among individuals. Augé identifies three main characteristics of a place: identity, which pertains to the unique character and significance of a location; relation, which refers to the social and cultural interactions that occur within the place; and history, which encompasses the collective experiences and memories that shape the identity of the place over time.
On the other hand, Augé defines “non-places” as a space that lacks a distinctive identity or meaning, and is instead defined by their function or purpose. These spaces are typically designed to be easily accessible and efficient, but they do not foster a sense of community or belonging due to their temporary nature. There are three primary characteristics of non-places: transience, which reflects their fleeting and temporary nature, designed for quick movement; anonymity, which refers to the lack of social interaction and connection among individuals in non-places, as people tend to be focused on their own goals rather than engaging with others; and uniformity, which describes the standardized and repetitive design of non-places, characterized by homogeneous features.
Our relationship with place is shaped by a multitude of factors, including our individual experiences, cultural background, and sensory perception. As technology continues to shape the way we interact with the world around us, the concept of place is also evolving to encompass digital spaces. These digital places offer unique opportunities for connection and community but also present new challenges and complexities. As we continue to navigate the changing landscape of place in the digital age, it is important to consider how these spaces shape our experiences and interactions and to explore new ways of fostering a sense of belonging and connection in both physical and digital places.
Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: an Introduction to Supermodernity. London: Verso.
Janz, B.B. (2017). Place, Space, and Hermeneutics. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
