Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.
an interdisciplinary experiment in cooperative learning
 
Week 11 Minutes

Week 11 Minutes

 

Meeting facilitated by Dante, apologies from Sophia W and Niamh

 

REFLECTIVE PIECE:

  • Reflective piece by the 5th January
  • Can be anything (video, text, art)
    • Dialogue (recording, email correspondence)
    • Art piece (collage, painting)
      • Can be a good idea to combine an image with supplementary text
      • Fragments of images to communicate a more complex message
      • Experiment with multimedia and different materials
      • Ask questions through your piece
    • Essay (reflect on the process, explore a question that came up for you) – alternate endings?
    • Poetry
    • Cinema essays/video log/interviews/news report format
    • If you choose a more creative route, it could be helpful to research artistic theory to help you make the transitions from words/thoughts to a visual medium
    • Journal entry/log book
    • A criticism piece – there’s value in bringing conflict into discussion
  • Do feedback of two people’s work (by first session)

 

SESSIONS FOR NEXT YEAR

  • Neil Mullholland – paragodgy/para-academic schooling
    • Give him an hour?
    • Sofia L contact him weeks 3-8
  • Neil Thin – wellbeing and happiness
    • Lucie to contact him
  • Interviews??
    • Sociology magazine
    • Rattlecap (Paula to contact)
  • Skillsharing
    • Facilitation (paula)
    • Ethnography (cara)
  • Reading discussions/raising concerns (maybe after external speakers/discussions)
  • 3x group presentations (hour) – should these be at the end of the course? Should the presentations happen before or after the projects are completed? Should there be a like halfway formative presentation as part of the project process then a final one at the end?
  • Project groups take a session is and plan it completely – 4, 5, 6
  • Post it on wordpress, finalise the plan by end of first session
  • Deans and associate dean of progression might come? – Dante to keep in contact with them

 

Tentative plan:

Week 1: reviewing reflective pieces

Week 2: reading group

Week 3: (external speaker?)

Week 4: bureaucracy group-run session

Week 5: pedagogy group-run session

Week 6: permaculture group-run session

Week 7:

Week 8:

Week 9:

Week 10:

To fit in:

  • Facilitation session
  • Ethnography session
  • Neils x2
    • Fit these around external speakers

 

EVALUATIONS:

  • Planning sessions have been useful but quite time consuming and not everyone can make them
  • Hopefully they’ll be less needed this year
  • No panic about being hyper productive all the time
  • Would like to bring back more physical and interactive activities as part of the session
  • Experiment with different ways of running sessions
  • Outdoor sessions in the nice weather!!
  • Having structure will help, working towards a goal is nice, having something to show for your work
  • Readings
  • Autonomous group communication is important
  • Transparency may not be completely necessary for the smaller groups – could it be a waste of time
  • Experimenting could have been pointless at the start of the course, it could
  • Production of a manifesto of the group, something to show and work towards is reassuring and helpful, and allows for experimentation
  • Not everyone agrees that a long term goal is appropriate
  • Looking at a new definition of learning and knowledge acquisition – the feeling of agency is refreshing in formal education and that feeling is what is important, not necessarily something to show at the end
  • Some think that taking the process as the product is limited – everyone has a different experience of the course and some may not get as much out of it without an end goal
  • Some form of product will help validate the course, as it is an experiment
  • Creating a reading list will help people to engage more
  • The reading list should not come from lecturer “authority” but from the group
  • People contribute expertise but do not try to angle the direction towards their areas
  • Some do not love reading so much – but if you do please bring articles to the group
  • Being active creates focus and productivity, creates a generative atmosphere, and having fixed aims can limit that energy
  • Being an alternative course means that it can’t produce the same amount as a more formal course, and it should identify areas that need to be questioned in the system and that can be it’s contribution
  • Find a balance between burden with structure and aims – structureless and aimlessness can provide its own anxieties
  • We can avoid having everything formally marked and graded, but we do have to play into it in a way
  • University is good at reproducing itself and creating more and more of the same – we should aim to leave something behind so this course is able to do the same – this course is an opportunity to create a resource for the future
  • The difference in involvement is a slight issue – some people taking it for credit, some auditing
  • Finding our own authority and taking control of our education within the group is important
  • The most important lesson of the occupation was from the declaration of occupation
  • People take different things – do we want concrete and tangible outputs or personal learning experiences – we must value both
  • And people should take action on what it is that they want from now on – if you think something is missing from the course, bring it to the group and it can become a part of it
  • The reflection is a good way to bridge the gap between tangible and learning
  • We could benefit from time outside of class to reflect on what’s happened
  • There are thousands of manifestos
  • We could reject the reproduction of the course – this is a personal and collective process and everyone has their own manifestos
  • De-academising the course and it feels good to not have to be well read and like relating to existing philosophers
  • Strength in organising is incredibly important
  • Novelty is not necessarily a good thing

 

KEY AREAS OF EVALUATION:

BRING BACK BEING ACTIVE/SILLY

RETURNING TO EXPLORING READINGS

EACH GROUP OFFER READINGS PER SESSION (deadline? 2 weeks before your session)

EACH GROUP PRODUCES A DOCUMENT ABOUT THEIR PROCESS (not strict – like a log)

SOME SORT OF ARTEFACT ABOUT THE COURSE FOR THE FUTURE

MORE REGULAR REFLECTIONS (maybe incorporate photography – be proactive about documentation of the course)

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel