Notes on discussion of assessment 26 Sept., small group
Note taker: Sophia
- Value of constructive feedback at an early stage of writing/working on an assignment
- Problem with anonymization of submissions, means that it is difficult to get such constructive feedback
- Myth that anonymity means impartiality—lack of attention to where a student started in their work, and how that changed over time
- Student becomes ‘just a number’
- Exams just focus on part of what is learned, not everything
- Example of good form of assessment: Historian’s Toolkit course in HCA, involved a lot of group work and problem solving
- Discussed whether we should take attendance
- Everyone wants to be here!
- Suggested course members sending apologies if they can’t make it, instead of taking attendance
Note taker: Laerke
- Value:
- interdisciplinary group projects: same topic looked at in diff. angles in diff. classes
- less structure in what the product should be; not assessed on form, but on context
- open essay questions, no word limits, think critically about question
- research projects, making own thesis
- open format
- different formats
- long-term projects
- team work
- study groups and exam groups
- Do not value:
- Only essays
- Specific essay questions, expected to use specific readings
- Two hour exam format; only teaches memorization
- Individualistic exam forms – loneliness
- South Korean system:
- Multiple choice tests
- Professors expect a structure, a specific answer
- Doesn’t encourage critical thinking
Notes on assessment discussion / The future of our university by blogadmin is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0