Jo Ho 自称为“数字身体性”(digital corporeality)的探索者,致力于研究数字与现实身体之间日益交织的存在状态。她的作品揭示了在技术高度发达的社会中,个体如何在软件与硬件、虚拟与现实之间寻求身份认同和时间感知。这种对数字与现实交汇的深入探讨,与展览主题中“女性时间贫困”的议题高度契合,特别是在探讨女性在数字时代中面临的时间碎片化和身份重构方面。 作品评估 《My Desire to Consume》(2022) 作品概述:《My Desire to Consume》是由 jo+kapi 策划的展览,展出于新加坡 Grey Projects。展览通过互动装置《ENZYME 1.0》模拟了数字艺术品在每次“交易”中逐渐退化的过程,探讨了数字艺术在市场化背景下的价值和易逝性。 与主题的契合性: 主题一致性: 作品反映了在数字时代,个体如何被技术设备的持续信息流所困扰,导致时间感的扭曲,尤其是女性在家庭和社会中所承受的时间压力。 批判性: 通过模拟数字艺术品的退化过程,质疑了我们对技术完美性的依赖和对时间控制的幻想,具有深刻的批判性。 媒介和体验: 结合互动装置和数字程序,提供了多层次的观展体验。 实际考虑: 作品由常见的电子组件构成,便于运输和安装,适合您的预算范围。 《ENZYME 1.2》(2023) 作品概述:《ENZYME 1.2》是由艺术家组合 jo+kapi 创作的互动装置作品,展出于新加坡艺术科学博物馆的“以太笔记”展览中。该作品结合了 AI 生成图像、物理装置和观众互动,探讨了数字艺术的物质性和数字资产的易逝性。观众通过扫描二维码“购买”一幅 AI 生成的图像,随后该图像会逐渐被像素化,直至模糊不清,象征着数字信息在每次传输中都会发生退化。 … Continue Reading →
根据我新的策展框架,艺术家张文心(Wenxin Zhang)的作品《Time Burns》的展览装置不仅由其影像本身构成,艺术家张文心通过空间中交错的线性干预与灯光渲染,构建出一个具象化的‘思维燃烧场’。 《The Bonfire of Time I–III》作品概念: 三段抽象动画以不同的3D模拟方式表现“时间的结构瓦解”,从形式上与《Memory Caustics》形成虚实对比,也与《Time Burns》的“日常时间毁灭”构成连续性的“时间崩坏”三部曲。 Bonfire I:如同一个不断扩展的“信息焦点旋涡”,象征现代人的注意力、时间被卷入不可逆的速度中; Bonfire II:空间坍缩与爆炸模拟,对应工作节奏中人力极限的崩塌; Bonfire III:聚合与消散的片面结构,隐喻碎片化生活、难以维系的“完整感”。 Memory Caustics (2017) 作品概念: 在作品《Memory Caustics》中,艺术家张文心使用自己过往旅途中的照片作为材质,通过3D建模与虚拟角色交互,将“记忆的地点”重新构造为数字模拟的空间。虚拟角色在这些模拟空间中行走、喝水、游泳、睡觉,看似悠闲自在,实则重复着一种被设定好的日常——一种被“编码”的时间生活。这种技术中介下的记忆再现,让“人类记忆”逐渐转化为“机器记忆”,隐喻了当代个体在技术—资本主义架构中时间控制的现状:我们生活在由他人/系统为我们建构的时间中,而非真正属于自己的节奏。 当我查看这位艺术家的简介时 她很有趣将自己定义为“地形构造者”(terrain builder),并非构造地貌奇观,而是借助影像、声音、装置和写作建构出“人类与非人类心智的可感地景”。她通过作品引导观众“从日常的平面中跌落”,进入一种“边界时间(liminal space-time)”中的感知状态。这种对于“时间—意识—空间”的复合性艺术语言,为本展览提供了重要的视觉与方法论支撑,帮助观众从自身经验出发,进入对时间控制机制的直观体验与反思。可与我的互动装置“如果我有时间……”结合在同一展区,观众在看完作品后,情绪处于感性觉醒状态,更愿意参与互动表达。 Resources: ZHANG Wenxin(b. 1989): https://www.zhangwenxin.com/wenxin-cv Project Time Burns: https://www.zhangwenxin.com/time-burns The Bonfire… Continue Reading →
This week, together with Yinuo and Ruoyun, I co-organized a group visit to the Collective Gallery’s Jerwood Survey III exhibition., I revisited my notes from Week 7 on Maud Sulter’s You Are My Kindred Spirit. This prompted me to reflect… Continue Reading →
Professor Kirsteen Macdonald’s lecture this week offered a new perspective on a question I raised in Week 7: “How can we reconstruct female experiences that have been erased by time and history through archives and voice?” Hal Foster’s concept of… Continue Reading →
This week, I began to re-examine the audience segmentation of my curatorial project.My mentor reminded me that audience segmentation must be specific and precise, with particular attention to the intersection of gender and culture. Building meaningful connections between different audience… Continue Reading →
In Week 10, our collective meeting focused on project updates, current challenges, and strategies for participatory curation. We shared a range of case studies and then brainstormed our own thematic proposals. I focused on designing an interactive element that would… Continue Reading →
During our tutorial, JL noted that “time poverty is not only a problem for East Asian women but also a structural, globalised issue, shaped by class and culture.”This insight made me realise that while my current exhibition—structured around “cognition–reflection–action”—emphasizes experiential… Continue Reading →
Reflection on FACT Public Projects In class this week, our group analysed the public projects of the UK-based FACT organisation. FACT’s Radical Ancestry exhibition employs methods of cooperative inquiry and co-creation, transforming audiences into active content producers through film screenings,… Continue Reading →
The discussions across the two meetings formed the “internal and external perspectives” of my project’s development—shedding light on how to move the project from a conceptual framework to practical implementation. On March 23, our Terra Obscura group meeting—organized by Feng… Continue Reading →
This week, I participated in two group activities in the Summer Hall.In the first session, I focused on planning the curatorial rhythm and discussing the Week 9 course content with other group members. Curatorial Rhythm: From Timeline to Structural Negotiation… Continue Reading →
© 2025 Shumiao Cheng / Curating (2024-2025)[SEM2] — Powered by WordPress
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑