Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.

WEEK1

WEEK1 Reading

I believe that the authors make the following suggestions to address the central and peripheral themes presented:

1.Theyadvocate for collaboration across disciplines and geographical areas to promote the exchange and testing of art, knowledge, and human concerns on a global scale. The aim of this is to transform host cities into transnational marketplaces through innovation and visual spectacle, taking into consideration significant shifts within the exhibition system and aesthetic precedents that shape our understanding of history and culture.

2.They suggest redefining the relationship between art and community by challenging the stereotype that Central American art is “exotic.” They recommend encouraging local artists to engage with a wider audience, step outside of their comfort zones, and communicate with foreign artists.

3.They propose making the artistic creation and viewing processes more open to the real world. Drawing on Documenta 11, which highlights the complexity of reality and the clash between diverse traditions, this approach challenges viewers to reconsider their understanding of the more unpleasant aspects of modern global culture. It aims to address the limitations imposed by cultural specialisation and the lack of interdomain interventionism.

4.The authors identify the challenge of fusing art and technology. While exploring this fusion, they caution against allowing the technical and visual aspects to overshadow the artist’s conceptual and critical intentions.

Furthermore, the authors note the decisive impact of postmodernism on art criticism and production, emphasising its role in promoting a pluralistic approach and a broad freedom of expression characteristic of the era. This shift towards recognising art as a dynamic interplay between various sociopolitical and cultural narratives rather than being defined by a single, authoritative view. This reflects a wider move towards inclusivity and the democratisation of artistic discourse, reflecting broader social changes and evolving perceptions of the role of art. The readings provided in this course highlight how art is influenced both internally by its environment and politics and externally by significant global events, such as the Cold War.

References

· Sobkovych, O. (2023) “Art Criticism of the 1990s in the Context of Artistic Discourse”, Актуальнi питання гуманiтарних наук, 2(70), pp. 92—97

 

Leave a reply

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel