Category: week 2
Bayne’s main key argument is to highlight assumptions made of the terminology of Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL). She negotiates three theoretical perspectives, calling into question the rhetoric of TEL. The level of detail applied to the terminology ‘Technology Enhanced Learning’ itself is impressive. Bayne goes a long way to prove that such a phrase is […]
The Hamilton & Friesen paper, “Online Education: A Science and Technology Studies Perspective” concludes that constructivism as a concept is a useful way of understanding and analysing technologies for learning.
I am struggling to get into academia again. Self-analysis of my writing: I don’t think I am structuring my writing well enough; it is all rather a stream of consciousness. Examples I use are anecdotal – does that matter? Am I using enough concrete examples? The model of a blog – having never written a […]
A few questions and thoughts about: Hamilton; Friesen (2013): “Online Education: A Science and Technology Perspective” One of the first premises laid out in the abstract, states that implicit philosophical perspectives on technology limit research into the pedagogical value and potential of new technologies. The article explores, in some depth, the differing perspectives of two […]
Recent comments