Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.
The discourse and practices of quality in higher education

Quality for equity

The global discourse of quality assurance in higher education has highjacked the discussion about quality enhancement.

The focus on the external, visible and performative aspects of quality depend on quality enhancement, but sets a high bar globally. Discourses of excellence shape national policies for internationalisation in several countries, especially those who wished to be ranked globally.

The concern about quality in higher has led many scholars to explore the field. Mari Elken and Bjorn Stensaker, for instance, offered a conceptual took to re-centre the discussion toward the practices of quality by proposing the concept of ‘quality work’, defined as the multiple practices that address the quality for educational provision (Elken & Stensaker, 2018, 2020).

We depart from their work to place quality as a form of global social policy.

Quality as global social policy relates to “how transnational modes of political organisation, action and forces are implicated in changes to the aims, characteristics and outcomes of social policies” (Yeates, 2014, p.7). It acknowledges the role of actors, yet questioning their rationale for acting. In addition, it takes into account that quality is embedded in an audit culture (Power, 1997), where accountability is at the centre of (higher) education governance.

Nonetheless, looking beyond the excellence discourse, we are that quality work aimed at quality enhancement (Williams, 2016) can be/come mechanisms for the promotion of equity at the institutional level.

This is because quality enhancement largely depends on day-to-day activities which do not get picked up by the formal assessments of quality assurance. Examples are: pre-sessional language courses, writing clinics, teacher training programmes for new staff, projects to support affirmative action students, to cite a few.

As such, the project is interested on the range of activities that directly and indirectly contribute to the ‘external’ world of quality in higher education to become visible.

 

Aliandra Barlete

 

How to cite this blog post:

Barlete, A (2024). Quality for equity. https://blogs.ed.ac.uk/quality-he/quality-for-equity/.

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel