It is worth bringing to the attention of the readers of this blog two new works of legal history, one a single-authored monograph, the other…
Comments closedThe Edinburgh Legal History Blog Posts
Blogs have been less frequent than one might wish in recent months for a variety of reasons, notably because of the time taken up in…
Comments closedNormally, the Centre has photographs of its research students at graduation to show; but this year, due to COVID, the usual graduation ceremonies have not…
Comments closedCentring Race in International Law, Thursday, 22 October 2020, 14:00 – 15:00. https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/centering-race-in-international-law-tickets-123355500623 Join us for a lecture as part of our Black History Month…
Comments closedIn 2014, the team of Loïc Cadiet, Serge Dauchy and Jean-Louis Halpérin published Itinéraires d’histoire de la procédure civile: 1. Regards français. This was the first product of a seminar that aimed to rectify a gap in the literature caused by the fact that much less attention had been paid to the history of civil procedure than to that of civil law. The volume is valuable. But in the common-law countries, of course, as the detailed common law had emerged from procedure, and the main focus had long been on the development of the law through decided cases, the issue was not so pressing. Of course, one can caricature the differing legal historiographies. The great difference between many of the continental countries and the British experience was codification, and the early-nineteenth-century exportation of French legal ideas over much of continental Europe.
Comments closed