Any views expressed within media held on this service are those of the contributors, should not be taken as approved or endorsed by the University, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University in respect of any particular issue.
A rabbit leaping through fields

Day 1: Session 2: Presentation 2

🗓️ Tuesday 20 May 2025  🕒 15:00-16:00

  • 🟢Theme: Critically exploring data-driven technologies and practices in digital education

 

Exploring complex entanglements of artificial intelligence technologies and educational practice through a diffractive approach

Michael Wolfindale

 

Recording

 

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) educational programmes often cover machine learning techniques shaped by specific conceptualisations of learning, a focus for my dissertation research. If one acknowledges the complexity of interrogating such entanglements of educational practice and AI technologies, and the human, nonhuman, material and abstract (more-than-human) entities involved, a methodological approach questioning traditional subject/object and human/nonhuman binaries is required. Reflexive approaches rooted in representationalism, informed by the metaphor of reflection, tend to reinforce subject/object boundaries. Haraway posits diffraction—revealing patterns produced through differences—as an alternative metaphor. A diffractive methodology, as taken forward by Barad, shifts the focus to ‘relations of difference’ within/beyond such boundaries.

‘Diffraction’ refers to the patterns produced when light, sound and other waves experience obstructions or openings. As light diffracted through an opening produces new patterns, in a diffractive analysis data is read through different theories—a transdisciplinary process enabling engagement with multiple ideas, generating tensions but new insights and questions. Such approaches provided inspiration for my dissertation research employing diffractive analysis to explore machine learning students’ conceptualisations of learning. By diffractively reading multimodal participatory conversation data through different (seemingly incompatible) theories—multimodal social-semiotics and anti-anthropocentric new materialisms—a new artefact was assembled. This artefact conveys relations between more-than-human components, through which the students’ conceptualisations of learning emerge. While behaviourist ideas—at times appearing to emphasise notions of control working against student autonomy—are made visible, a complex multi-faceted picture is presented.

During this session, I outline my diffractive methodology and data analysis process, and discuss the multimodal insights generated. Through this, I demonstrate how a diffractive analysis can critically explore entanglements of AI technologies and educational practice—from a detailed reading of data through multiple theories, new ideas and provocations emerge. Finally, I invite discussion about how such approaches might inform transdisciplinary AI education and research.

Leave a reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel