MA Contemporary Art Theory

MA Contemporary Art Theory

Re-imagining the Art School Since 2001

Week 6 //// Atelier Workshop #2

image_pdfimage_print

Post Qualitative & Artistic Research: Inventing Non-Methods

 

Like many of the social sciences, the discipline of anthropology has experienced a turn away from a preoccupation with research method design towards open and holistic approaches to research. Very generally speaking, this is often termed the ‘post-qualitative’ turn.

 

In anthropology, this turn can be seen in a tendency towards openness and multiplicity of approaches, towards understanding the researcher as a reflexive, feeling, social being, one that fully experiences and is implicated in the research process. In anthropology, this turn can also be witnessed in attempts to use bricolage as a means of curating and communicating the process of research. (e.g. see the set reading by Kerasovitis, K. 2020.) Bricolage simultaneously serves a self-conscious literary means of constructing the identities of the researcher/researched while deconstructing the extant genres of ‘academic writing’. (e.g. McLean, S., 2017. ‘Chapter 1: An Encounter in the Mist’, Fictionalizing anthropology : encounters and fabulations at the edges of the human, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. p1-20)

 

Art, in contrast, does not have a longstanding tradition of research method design. From the perspective of the social sciences, many of the underlying assumptions of artistic research could be said to be predominately ‘post-qualitative’ in character. Artistic researchers commonly present themselves as feeling, reflexive, social beings and tend to take experiential bricolage approaches that explicitly resist hypotheses, routes, goals and pre-determined structures in favour of flow and/or chaos (e.g. see the set reading by Ingold, T. 2018.) Artistic research has, also, recently invested in fictioning and fabulation; self-conscious literary means of constructing the identities of the artist-researcher/subject. Fictioning and fabulation are allied more with autobiography and fiction than they are with the non-fictional genres of ‘academic writing’. Fictioning and fabulation, importantly, involve generating the mise-en-scene of research within which the researcher and the research subject both reside. (e.g. see: Burrows, David, and Simon O’Sullivan. ’10. Myth Analysis: Lessons in Enchantment’, in Fictioning: The Myth-functions of Contemporary Art and Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019. p175-198.)

 

The first Material you will examine, an art/anthropology project by the artist/anthropologist Hermione Spriggs, stems from these disciplinary overlaps and shadows. Drawing on painting as a metaphor, Spriggs, usefully, describes the ‘post-qualitative’ play here as a series of Figure–ground Reversals between Art and Anthropology. (See: Spriggs, Hermione. “‘Uurga Shig’ – What Is It like to Be a Lasso? Drawing Figure–ground Reversals between Art and Anthropology.” Journal of Material Culture 21, no. 4 (2016): 405-28.) We must – simultaneously – consider art to be the ‘ground’ for anthropological research and anthropology to be the ‘ground’ for artistic research. Equally, we must acknowledge the artist/anthropologist/subject as alternating between being a ‘figure’ (in painting: a distinct image that floats above the ground of the canvas) and an integral part of theground‘ (the socio-cultural material being ‘researched’)… Figure–ground Reversals are everywhere in ‘post-qualitative’ play.

In this Atelier, you will work with two materials and subject them to the different gazes of approaches developed within artistic research and post-qualitative anthropology In this, we seek to identify Figure–ground Reversals at play within the approaches we are working with. This, hopefully, will inspire and encourage you to bricolage your own (post-quals) approaches to research.

Core Viewing

All students must watch:

Material A

Hermione Spriggs Uurga Shig (4:24, 2017) Two-channel digital video with sound, specially formatted for single-channel desktop viewing. https://www.uclmal.com/hermione-spriggs
Please also consider reading: Spriggs, Hermione. “‘Uurga Shig’ – What Is It like to Be a Lasso? Drawing Figure–ground Reversals between Art and Anthropology.” Journal of Material Culture 21, no. 4 (2016): 405-28. https://discovered.ed.ac.uk/permalink/44UOE_INST/1viuo5v/cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1866651268

Material B

Ana Vaz: i prefer not to be but to Tupi: the age of the earth (21:45) from Sonic Acts on Vimeo (28 February 2016) SONIC ACTS ACADEMY,  De Brakke Grond, Amsterdam, the Netherlands


Core Reading

All students must read:
Kerasovitis, K. (2020). Post Qualitative Research – Reality through the Antihierarchical Assemblage of non-Calculation. The Qualitative Report, 25(13), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4756 
and
Ingold, T. Anthropology Between Art and Science: An Essay on the Meaning of Research, FIELD, Issue 11, Fall 2018. http://field-journal.com/issue-11/anthropology-between-art-and-science-an-essay-on-the-meaning-of-research

Additional Resources:

In Miro, you will find a number of different resources to compliment this Atelier.
You should read/listen to/watch at least one resource.
Engage with whichever text appears to be of most interest to you.

After Atelier Workshop #2:

In the Swarm Reading of Kerasovitis, K. (2020) frame within Miro, post a comment/response on two or more of the post-its / quotations.
You can post in any of the four frames (blue, red, green or yellow). If it helps to illustrate your ideas, you can pull in Material A Hermione Spriggs Uurga Shig (4:24, 2017) or Material B Ana Vaz: i prefer not to be but to Tupi: the age of the earth (21:45) as examples of non-qualitative artistic research.
Please also post both comments in your Blog. Your supervisor will pick up on the comments next week in your tutorial.
css.php

Report this page

To report inappropriate content on this page, please use the form below. Upon receiving your report, we will be in touch as per the Take Down Policy of the service.

Please note that personal data collected through this form is used and stored for the purposes of processing this report and communication with you.

If you are unable to report a concern about content via this form please contact the Service Owner.

Please enter an email address you wish to be contacted on. Please describe the unacceptable content in sufficient detail to allow us to locate it, and why you consider it to be unacceptable.
By submitting this report, you accept that it is accurate and that fraudulent or nuisance complaints may result in action by the University.

  Cancel