@brianbuccola @bronwyn @sociolinguista "However, in this particular case we agree with the reviewers that a potential solution lies in [...], which means that the problem no longer appears intractable without its proper evaluation in this new light. Doing that, of course, would not fit a Squib." So there you go.

Jun 14, 2021

@brianbuccola @bronwyn @sociolinguista Ah, here we go: "It is true that there seems to be a contradiction between our decision letter and what our website states. Squibs do not necessarily require a full analysis."

Jun 14, 2021

Itamar Kastner retweeted:

I hope this email doesn't find you. I hope you've escaped, that you're free.

Jun 10, 2021

@matspike @LingBuzz @arxiv_cscl Oh there are plenty of alternative peer-review/post-publication-review processes that could make sense - that's reasonable. The question I had in mind in the poll was more specific.

Jun 7, 2021